From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Smith Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a choosepid() syscall as a simpler alternative to clone_with_pids() Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:52:57 -0800 Message-ID: <87ws281weu.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> References: <1257194293-12099-1-git-send-email-danms@us.ibm.com> <4AEF45BB.4080609@librato.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4AEF45BB.4080609-RdfvBDnrOixBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> (Oren Laadan's message of "Mon\, 02 Nov 2009 15\:48\:59 -0500") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Oren Laadan Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org, ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org OL> 2. What do you expect to gain by splitting the work into two OL> separate system calls ? Simplicity and avoidance of the arch-specific issues, which seems to be what hung us up on $NEW_CLONE_NAME_O'_THE_DAY. -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center email: danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org