From: "David Kågedal" <davidk@lysator.liu.se>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document --ignore-if-in-upstream in git-format-patch
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:13:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wt3ke82t.fsf@morpheus.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.63.0701181437200.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, David Kågedal wrote:
>
>> Someone who knows how it *actually* works is encouraged to send a
>> better explanation.
>
> Nice try... Unfortunately, I don't have time to do it.
>
>> +--ignore-if-in-upstream::
>> + Do not include the same patch twice. If there are two commits
>> + that would produce identical patches, the second one is
>> + excluded from the output.
>
> This is not what it does, though. (If in doubt, use the source, Luke).
I did. But I haven't learnt to navigate it yet. I get confused by
the global state in the code, which makes it hard to know when I
function call returns interesting information or changes some global
table.
> Given a range upstream..localbranch, --ignore-if-in-upstream looks at all
> diffs associated with commits in localbranch..upstream (i.e. all commits
> upstream has, but not localbranch), and when traversing
> upstream..localbranch to output the commits with diffs, drops those at the
> floor which were already seen in localbranch..upstream.
Ah, now I see. How about this, then:
+--ignore-if-in-upstream::
+ Do not include a patch that matches a commit in
+ <until>..<since>. This will examine all patches reachable
+ from <since> but not from <until> and compare them with the
+ patches being generated, and any patch that matches is
+ ignored.
It's hard to get something readable without writing lots about what
<since>..<until> actually means. Which might actually be a good idea
to do. But I don't have time to do that :-)
--
David Kågedal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-18 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-18 11:27 [PATCH] Document --ignore-if-in-upstream in git-format-patch David Kågedal
2007-01-18 13:40 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-18 14:13 ` David Kågedal [this message]
2007-01-18 14:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-19 16:58 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wt3ke82t.fsf@morpheus.local \
--to=davidk@lysator.liu.se \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.