From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists1p.gnu.org (lists1p.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52A12CD98EE for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 06:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wZjm4-0006Xc-Dx; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 02:29:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists1p.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wZjlk-0006Sn-Tz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 02:29:03 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1wZjli-0005JJ-A4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 02:29:00 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-4629d80fa08so288364f8f.3 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 23:28:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1781677733; x=1782282533; darn=nongnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=+oTNNqJndgPRI/V6E3Q3Aon3XWcY5YX/dMe9WULB0bs=; b=bV+VPn5yNRdrHaijMdHUQnf5+Nk2wdu63qRb+nZj9n+O4Pa77o/b1z+GzHyTWjzgLp je7bIcVpGnwkEbiJKzNhwIIr+MhOvRiP5z5pM5V9n5jiP6iBkT289L3iJ6AtDayeKOTd /0MAGleOoPyrUHSm5AcPtf7KUpLHwJ+xS2zVrRi40NP/igIX7kJv3wOSLZJmX/hNehAu vXOzsvtTTk1zn+J+K2rOy5LLsnnjFg5Vh4QDvP3+pW0Lsu1Rj65rRr3r5mGkOVdNEpqx T0zrjmQE/UIyI2vN7dKu2FzPWTlakvJzyJ+IamQi27zYXr+kTi8nerbTbnSmGWs+CqFU eEuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1781677733; x=1782282533; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+oTNNqJndgPRI/V6E3Q3Aon3XWcY5YX/dMe9WULB0bs=; b=mIFzdBFpSZgLLi1kA7ID7xsXOK8eI9il+rndVb8/Cg+R3urU1O/wKrLiYb0luasIWB g/IyFDR27cX03UZh8O9zeLSjAMmFnVHMWWO0rCNu/ab2YX+OT4aHYKGZ2B1wGAsT/Buc eT7zEeiSyjgvUg0l7WPA2wFCUPbmI2JmjuZ8cEC/xzJpX0tEzXyVpaR6uiQNKPsNj8HZ t0bI0JKs/kbIIO2EORTTT6qvCluBs0V9P3yR5xUtRuLB7ZgoXe+AH94z4im/Gi3udxFo G+/oASRd7mJ13gPl/YfQw0q2aF9vghza90b2odIL2CsTyCQPdRFfapdhTf2piJ9ee5dX CFwQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ99N/Otf8l7hO9yXFw34UOjJSQ+//38gOeul0wtFxemXTxVn4gYEqWuDi/P2qN2W+exrWJu1aN5ZINv@nongnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzgq2rA3UvcS9URH20UjUlqSY+tkQxH++kVuV22qzAVa0aHKXhf zSKyzbXeL8U2wVBHdiCIKg5rBLgBcoZhJAAhibHI0iL0rM7b0bjBaS1f9SKKRutt/P0= X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OGRzNjEAcPPUoF+cF6ZQVLoXs7W05QPe/uWTv+M10Xo7eqLTOR5z5mH5bRmbBm 4NaFEf4DRQZtrECU0ilc6mbbHNIJXNALgX0e8c1EK8Bu5VGQsdAJ8NyUzusavWJhe9F646KbkHq 3LkSCTB1AmoIOLo6W/fIqCVGx8GsqwRngIXxWsg054LBj3kP8v2fQAx7vWdtSkP4tPi8Ah2iCb7 ODkdq9DdQa0k8m7ufGB8JZYTjvwiIPu/lVhho84A72Ee7HDZobCWBnwcRtyn9RgBkPtUECp5TNE 2bUv8LXi0/M49QtxvNhpN5zYEEY5vkdT8603h6/OAsyeF+CcLuKJCPqfOF4P6tvtuAGPHTE7ZIg M0nZ3xDggCwBflZ/cQ6O8FruihZPHKwjMJ5MuHDlg3piSBFiGM0W75dF3nCfX8hzc7rI0FQqgHm vay4MS2EwvBOhNbNuLSFlkVNg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:c3db:10b0:490:e19b:bd99 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-492333de36cmr31189985e9.30.1781677733097; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 23:28:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from draig.lan ([185.124.0.195]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-49233bf3a7bsm27941795e9.2.2026.06.16.23.28.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Jun 2026 23:28:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from draig (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by draig.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69745F803; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 07:28:48 +0100 (BST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Alex_Benn=C3=A9e?= To: Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang=C3=A9?= Cc: Christian Borntraeger , Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Alistair Francis , BALATON Zoltan , Fabiano Rosas , Kevin Wolf , Peter Maydell , Warner Losh , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs/devel: relax policy on AI-generated contributions In-Reply-To: ("Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9=22's?= message of "Tue, 16 Jun 2026 18:44:16 +0100") References: <20260529094619.1034458-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <9ad69343-38b5-449c-8d7b-5cbde9d3b72f@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.14.2-pre1; emacs 30.1 Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 07:28:48 +0100 Message-ID: <87y0gdhe8v.fsf@draig.linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::433; envelope-from=alex.bennee@linaro.org; helo=mail-wr1-x433.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: qemu development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Daniel P. Berrang=C3=A9 writes: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 07:06:23PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> Am 29.05.26 um 11:46 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >> > -Exceptions do not remove the need for authors to comply with all other >> > -requirements for contribution. In particular, the "Signed-off-by" >> > -label in a patch submission is a statement that the author takes >> > -responsibility for the entire contents of the patch, including any pa= rts >> > -that were generated or assisted by AI tools or other tools. >> > +.. code-block:: none >> > + >> > + AI-used-for: tests, docs >> > + AI-used-for: code >> > + AI-used-for: code (refactoring) >> > + AI-used-for: code (prototype) >> > + AI-used-for: research >> > + >> > +``AI-used-for`` should not be included for "background" usage such as >> > +autocomplete or obtaining a pre-review of the patch. >>=20 >> So what about using AI for security scanning? So how do we want to treat >> a patch from a human that is based on an AI report. >> And if ok, would we then add something like >>=20 >> Reported-by: Claude, chatgpt whatever? > > I see no need to provide advertizing for these tools. > > Our security disclosure rules require that the submitter acknowledge > they have reviewed any LLM output themselves before reporting. So > from that POV it is the human who gave us the report and whom > deserves the credit, not any tool or vendor. > > FWIW, although pretty much every security report recently smells > strongly of LLM (highly structured markdown with headings that > look the same from all reporters), almost none of them credit the > specific tool used anyway. We have created a new label Audit Tooling: AI in the issues but the most interesting thing about that is to see how AI does compared to existing fuzzing and static analysis techniques. The underlying model isn't super interesting here. > > With regards, > Daniel --=20 Alex Benn=C3=A9e Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro