From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, djwong@kernel.org, zlang@kernel.org,
david@fromorbit.com, nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] common/config: Introduce _exit wrapper around exit command
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 14:43:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y0wbj9ru.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <352a430ecbcb4800d31dc5a33b2b4a9f97fc810a.1744090313.git.nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
"Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com> writes:
> We should always set the value of status correctly when we are exiting.
> Else, "$?" might not give us the correct value.
> If we see the following trap
> handler registration in the check script:
>
> if $OPTIONS_HAVE_SECTIONS; then
> trap "_kill_seq; _summary; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> else
> trap "_kill_seq; _wrapup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> fi
>
> So, "exit 1" will exit the check script without setting the correct
> return value. I ran with the following local.config file:
>
> [xfs_4k_valid]
> FSTYP=xfs
> TEST_DEV=/dev/loop0
> TEST_DIR=/mnt1/test
> SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/loop1
> SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt1/scratch
>
> [xfs_4k_invalid]
> FSTYP=xfs
> TEST_DEV=/dev/loop0
> TEST_DIR=/mnt1/invalid_dir
> SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/loop1
> SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt1/scratch
>
> This caused the init_rc() to catch the case of invalid _test_mount
> options. Although the check script correctly failed during the execution
> of the "xfs_4k_invalid" section, the return value was 0, i.e "echo $?"
> returned 0. This is because init_rc exits with "exit 1" without
> correctly setting the value of "status". IMO, the correct behavior
> should have been that "$?" should have been non-zero.
>
> The next patch will replace exit with _exit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> common/config | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/common/config b/common/config
> index 79bec87f..eb6af35a 100644
> --- a/common/config
> +++ b/common/config
> @@ -96,6 +96,14 @@ export LOCAL_CONFIGURE_OPTIONS=${LOCAL_CONFIGURE_OPTIONS:=--enable-readline=yes}
>
> export RECREATE_TEST_DEV=${RECREATE_TEST_DEV:=false}
>
> +# This functions sets the exit code to status and then exits. Don't use
> +# exit directly, as it might not set the value of "status" correctly.
...as it might not set the value of "$status" correctly, which is used
as an exit code in the trap handler routine set up by the check script.
> +_exit()
> +{
> + status="$1"
> + exit "$status"
> +}
> +
I agree with Darrick’s suggestion here. It’s safer to update status only
when an argument is passed - otherwise, it’s easy to trip over this.
Let’s also avoid defaulting status to 0 inside _exit(). That way, if the
caller forgets to pass an argument but has explicitly set status
earlier, we preserve the intended value.
We should update _exit() with...
test -n "$1" && status="$1"
-ritesh
> # Handle mkfs.$fstyp which does (or does not) require -f to overwrite
> set_mkfs_prog_path_with_opts()
> {
> --
> 2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-08 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-08 5:37 [PATCH v3 0/6] Minor cleanups in common/ Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-08 5:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] generic/749: Remove redundant sourcing of common/rc Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-08 5:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] generic/367: Remove redundant sourcing if common/config Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-08 9:06 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-04-09 5:04 ` Zorro Lang
2025-04-08 5:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] check: Remove redundant _test_mount in check Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-08 5:37 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] check,common{rc,preamble}: Decouple init_rc() call from sourcing common/rc Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-08 5:37 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] common/config: Introduce _exit wrapper around exit command Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-08 9:13 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2025-04-08 16:15 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-08 16:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-08 16:35 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-08 11:35 ` Dave Chinner
2025-04-08 16:43 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-09 0:44 ` Dave Chinner
2025-04-09 7:07 ` Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
2025-04-08 5:37 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] common: exit --> _exit Nirjhar Roy (IBM)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y0wbj9ru.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nirjhar.roy.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.