From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10CAEC3DA4A for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2025 21:00:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1trNk2-0004ib-2t; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 16:59:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1trNjj-0004Si-FF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 16:59:03 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1trNjX-0007EF-TH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 16:59:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1741553821; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ro8XkoWL2wyA0+551wDEq005vzKjyzvoRrDng2tN6Aw=; b=LOX0A/W14FjESFO6uWuyQqxn+rrldBhF2nvy14qxtyfp09Anku1zgSOUTfnKEalnqO6fB6 EUOB7RFUr4CYsgFSDKUK7DMayY8qWciYg4AgkgA5C5n7C7KP0f17qF6ZihBCiRNrYEFEcW ng3jnkOwJu5F7h097dZHUHM/KRASHYU= Received: from mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-47-5oUufa6fNVyswBvnSfLkaQ-1; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 16:51:27 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 5oUufa6fNVyswBvnSfLkaQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 5oUufa6fNVyswBvnSfLkaQ_1741553486 Received: from mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.111]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 869A9180035C; Sun, 9 Mar 2025 20:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.44.22.4]) by mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28847180094A; Sun, 9 Mar 2025 20:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B3C0121E675F; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 21:51:23 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: John Snow Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Michael Roth , Daniel P. =?utf-8?Q?Berrang=C3=A9?= , Eric Blake , Thomas Huth , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , Peter Maydell , Harmonie Snow Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 23/62] docs/qapi-domain: add :deprecated: directive option In-Reply-To: <20250309083550.5155-24-jsnow@redhat.com> (John Snow's message of "Sun, 9 Mar 2025 04:35:10 -0400") References: <20250309083550.5155-1-jsnow@redhat.com> <20250309083550.5155-24-jsnow@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 21:51:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87y0xeylkk.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.111 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org John Snow writes: > Although "deprecated" is a feature (and *will* appear in the features > list), add a special :deprecated: option to generate an eye-catch that > makes this information very hard to miss. > > (The intent is to modify qapidoc.py to add this option whenever it > detects that the features list attached to a definition contains the > "deprecated" entry.) > > - > > RFC: Technically, this object-level option is un-needed and could be > replaced with a standard content-level directive that e.g. qapidoc.py > could insert at the beginning of the content block. I've done it here as > an option to demonstrate how it would be possible to do. > > It's a matter of taste for "where" we feel like implementing it. > > One benefit of doing it this way is that we can create a single > containing box to set CSS style options controlling the flow of multiple > infoboxes. The other way to achieve that would be to create a directive > that allows us to set multiple options instead, e.g.: > > .. qapi:infoboxes:: deprecated unstable > > or possibly: > > .. qapi:infoboxes:: > :deprecated: > :unstable: > > For now, I've left these as top-level QAPI object options. "Hey, it works." I think we agreed to delete the text from RFC: until here. > P.S., I outsourced the CSS ;) > > Signed-off-by: Harmonie Snow > Signed-off-by: John Snow