From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: uma.shankar@intel.com, jouni.hogander@intel.com,
Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Implement WA to help reach PC10
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 11:29:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y12w743q.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241006164934.1689930-2-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
On Sun, 06 Oct 2024, Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> wrote:
> +static bool
> +intel_psr_is_dc5_entry_possible(struct intel_display *display,
> + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc;
Always struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> +
> + if ((display->power.domains.target_dc_state &
> + DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC5_DC6_MASK) == 0)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (!crtc_state->has_psr && !crtc_state->has_sel_update &&
> + !crtc_state->has_panel_replay)
> + return false;
> +
> + for_each_intel_crtc(display->drm, intel_crtc) {
> + struct drm_crtc *crtc = &intel_crtc->base;
Just don't add struct drm_crtc local variables, so you don't get the
name conflict.
> + struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank;
> + struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> +
> + if (!intel_crtc->active)
> + continue;
> +
> + vblank = drm_crtc_vblank_crtc(crtc);
> +
> + if (vblank->enabled)
> + return false;
> +
> + for_each_encoder_on_crtc(display->drm, crtc, encoder)
> + if (encoder->type != INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP ||
> + !CAN_PSR(enc_to_intel_dp(encoder)))
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
[snip]
> +void intel_psr_compute_config_late(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder,
Always struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_encoder);
> + struct intel_dp *dp = enc_to_intel_dp(intel_encoder);
Always struct intel_dp *intel_dp;
> +
> + if (DISPLAY_VER(display) == 20) {
> + mutex_lock(&dp->psr.lock);
> + dp->psr.is_dpkgc_configured =
> + intel_psr_is_dpkgc_configured(display, crtc_state);
> + dp->psr.is_dc5_entry_possible =
> + intel_psr_is_dc5_entry_possible(display, crtc_state);
> + dp->psr.is_wa_delayed_vblank_limit =
> + intel_psr_check_wa_delayed_vblank(&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode);
> + mutex_unlock(&dp->psr.lock);
> + }
> +}
> +
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-10 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-03 14:53 [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Implement WA to help reach PC10 Suraj Kandpal
2024-10-03 15:26 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2024-10-03 15:27 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-03 15:28 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-03 15:39 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-03 15:42 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-03 15:43 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-03 16:02 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-10-03 17:30 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-03 20:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-10-06 16:49 ` [PATCH] " Suraj Kandpal
2024-10-09 14:45 ` Jani Nikula
2024-10-10 3:41 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-10 8:40 ` Jani Nikula
2024-10-17 4:45 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-10 8:29 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-10-06 16:53 ` Suraj Kandpal
2024-10-07 15:54 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/psr: Implement WA to help reach PC10 (rev2) Patchwork
2024-10-07 15:54 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-07 15:56 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-07 16:07 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-07 16:09 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-07 16:11 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-07 16:43 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-08 2:54 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-10-08 7:22 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 7:54 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Implement WA to help reach PC10 Suraj Kandpal
2024-10-17 7:55 ` Suraj Kandpal
2024-10-23 10:27 ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-11-04 9:01 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-17 8:03 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/psr: Implement WA to help reach PC10 (rev3) Patchwork
2024-10-17 8:03 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 8:04 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 8:16 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 8:18 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 8:20 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-17 8:37 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-10-17 8:56 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-10-17 10:03 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-10-17 17:24 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-11-06 9:00 [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Implement WA to help reach PC10 Suraj Kandpal
2024-11-04 9:12 Suraj Kandpal
2024-11-04 14:18 ` Jani Nikula
2024-11-06 8:18 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-09-09 6:32 [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Implment " Suraj Kandpal
2024-09-20 9:12 ` [PATCH] drm/i915/psr: Implement " Suraj Kandpal
2024-09-20 11:45 ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-09-23 2:54 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-09-23 10:23 ` Shankar, Uma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y12w743q.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
--cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.