From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8C65C25B74 for ; Fri, 24 May 2024 19:36:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=zXm/iNrRZ27KXsL5fAvE1xwDsGmM4lXezB20gJzqAFA=; b=N2NoEgerjWuma+ IYolMB2/oLIVyuX2XcxU5f93ItkjwFigcpIaEGBMCASqkDqr+qckUH2ubDbZTqHHTym2cUNmxDzpU TjsIXatWgGnghVShGUcSVxCaBHuJrI3skaM4cIHJaN5vUKPklowiVIaHMXw9A1p4xzVRLVeodfBXl Bsk8lc/rJqBWjYmkTPN7J3FTchFd0uer40bVdN6JI29/9W/CzHW1+AbAIO3U2utxDy/fYdKoFSTSl /iIxY75dCHXQs8xe3YuajTHXBwIS4eEDuuyue1uutylcb4z1ccxmCza++pKudIUwJHWbkWRSXmpIZ J9LNj67YG7jd8x+/+DaQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sAaii-00000009j5k-07bQ; Fri, 24 May 2024 19:36:52 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sAaiP-00000009iqX-3cpP for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 24 May 2024 19:36:50 +0000 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1716579390; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iyBt2ECzfVmFCZHLo5ZC95DN7e5Ms+svFwknAIN23AQ=; b=3WD9/WcC2NxMMIC4HZU1cBqAMMWsNLq1yOqBP888RkF3HxgY/j3QNoZM7ziMvg4bJ5JIbo /iZNFONV+nHh/8Hc55z9oOv+bqtJCDDkazvqULpQlN//8yXwV17ZUfNAGK0Q8ooklA3HTI YBQ9GL8sQN76jJThK+hzui0WmnmTwLIQscgpeYofbZYRl6zVHjkey78ekK/0NNu5R0JpBl jIhG/xpopaoQU0iu0G0sO5sVwO07HRqW4A8GA3dEkZIPRDgqUNRrki31o/9OHV8jbOJXsf I63DGyHGAiq7EV2PKwQU6u4M5SxNpAQ5UsqTAwVP32/VTGN+O5E1Dhnd55Tp/w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1716579390; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iyBt2ECzfVmFCZHLo5ZC95DN7e5Ms+svFwknAIN23AQ=; b=qU+VxrMOzqTSj/kFZ90TGVWqWp4Dia3K5914XJoI7iPg7S5xAo6c7RH8CM2kx9BKYgCkwn 9H0wFxPovVYtPqCg== To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: linux@roeck-us.net, Conor Dooley , naresh.kamboju@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, apatel@ventanamicro.com, anders.roxell@linaro.org, dan.carpenter@linaro.org, Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: riscv: irq-riscv-imsic-early.c:52:9: error: too many arguments to function 'riscv_ipi_set_virq_range' In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 21:36:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87y17zc88y.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240524_123634_190075_C45051AC X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.80 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, May 24 2024 at 10:35, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Fri, 24 May 2024 10:18:42 PDT (-0700), tglx@linutronix.de wrote: >> On Fri, May 24 2024 at 08:10, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 10:05:59AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >>>> as a conflict resolution, which IIUC should happen when Linus merges my next >>>> PR. So I'll try and remember to call that out. >>>> >>> >>> Unfortunately it looks like the conflict resolution did not happen, >>> and mainline builds are now affected. >> >> Fix is queued and goes to Linus tomorrow. > > Sorry I misesd this. The PR I sent Linus this morning contains my fix > from earlier this week: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/171647463438.13050.6219786365640043025.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org/T/#t Happens. I don't rebase my try. I just mention it to Linus when I send the pull request. It's the same change so the result is a NOOP and not another conflict :) Thanks, tglx _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 245205BACF for ; Fri, 24 May 2024 19:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716579393; cv=none; b=P4QYph8Oo4qpcJxMWLrx8hECX63XV9IFrnhD3/wiEmdCQSwSvZaZZfcaB8u6nHvmPF6OXBlmxr8yv0XXYRp2ux/sq51L0wlkrEfNghSAxLSxoKmXuivCq9NFhOaeCPgJ4B/zyLbOiot2N0NQpCcuXx0vfWXxhYekAuHsEqPm5xM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716579393; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hNm24N+303+Eh3MG7JmHts0ImqtsVr4f5oZlFElgeCU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=O+XAKx2/H1IAYto/0cjntmYdh2m4YzyZVq4KNQqN/yqEKgBvUnOPIbBt1lI6KNYmgLk9FF1Bgdr9lu/3YybAP0zNDr9H8tD0HUns4Qe/WYHMgJSh6V9cjmCr4VUhnduf8slPkRd7zZtQOC6Iau2IxeT2t2W+1VB0kn55dBb/KAU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=3WD9/WcC; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=qU+VxrMO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="3WD9/WcC"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="qU+VxrMO" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1716579390; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iyBt2ECzfVmFCZHLo5ZC95DN7e5Ms+svFwknAIN23AQ=; b=3WD9/WcC2NxMMIC4HZU1cBqAMMWsNLq1yOqBP888RkF3HxgY/j3QNoZM7ziMvg4bJ5JIbo /iZNFONV+nHh/8Hc55z9oOv+bqtJCDDkazvqULpQlN//8yXwV17ZUfNAGK0Q8ooklA3HTI YBQ9GL8sQN76jJThK+hzui0WmnmTwLIQscgpeYofbZYRl6zVHjkey78ekK/0NNu5R0JpBl jIhG/xpopaoQU0iu0G0sO5sVwO07HRqW4A8GA3dEkZIPRDgqUNRrki31o/9OHV8jbOJXsf I63DGyHGAiq7EV2PKwQU6u4M5SxNpAQ5UsqTAwVP32/VTGN+O5E1Dhnd55Tp/w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1716579390; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iyBt2ECzfVmFCZHLo5ZC95DN7e5Ms+svFwknAIN23AQ=; b=qU+VxrMOzqTSj/kFZ90TGVWqWp4Dia3K5914XJoI7iPg7S5xAo6c7RH8CM2kx9BKYgCkwn 9H0wFxPovVYtPqCg== To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: linux@roeck-us.net, Conor Dooley , naresh.kamboju@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, apatel@ventanamicro.com, anders.roxell@linaro.org, dan.carpenter@linaro.org, Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: riscv: irq-riscv-imsic-early.c:52:9: error: too many arguments to function 'riscv_ipi_set_virq_range' In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 21:36:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87y17zc88y.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Fri, May 24 2024 at 10:35, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Fri, 24 May 2024 10:18:42 PDT (-0700), tglx@linutronix.de wrote: >> On Fri, May 24 2024 at 08:10, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 10:05:59AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >>>> as a conflict resolution, which IIUC should happen when Linus merges my next >>>> PR. So I'll try and remember to call that out. >>>> >>> >>> Unfortunately it looks like the conflict resolution did not happen, >>> and mainline builds are now affected. >> >> Fix is queued and goes to Linus tomorrow. > > Sorry I misesd this. The PR I sent Linus this morning contains my fix > from earlier this week: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/171647463438.13050.6219786365640043025.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org/T/#t Happens. I don't rebase my try. I just mention it to Linus when I send the pull request. It's the same change so the result is a NOOP and not another conflict :) Thanks, tglx