Re: [PULL 11/18] migration: Create migrate_block_bitmap_mapping() function

[Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>]

Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote:
> Am 03.05.2023 um 19:15 hat Juan Quintela geschrieben:
>> Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > Am 27.04.2023 um 17:22 hat Juan Quintela geschrieben:
>> >> Notice that we changed the test of ->has_block_bitmap_mapping
>> >> for the test that block_bitmap_mapping is not NULL.
>> >> 
>> >> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
>> >> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
>> >> 
>> >> ---
>> >> 
>> >> Make it return const (vladimir)
>> >
>> > (I don't think this part was actually meant for the commit message)
>> 
>> yeap.  My understandig has always been that this is the way to put
>> commenst for the email.
>
> Yes, but this only works if you then actually apply the patch from the
> mail with "git am". Seems you directly cherry-picked your local commit
> instead, so the comment below "---" has now become part of the git
> history.

Oops.  Yeap, I normally rebase my patches on top of upstream.


> We were asked a while ago to always use "git am -m" to include the
> Message-ID header from the email, so applying from the list is what we
> should be doing anyway, even for our own patches.

Oops.

Will do from now on.

Thanks.