All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/dp: Actually read Adjust Request Post Cursor2 register
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:34:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y24o7sry.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202112100853.FDB294B86@keescook>

On Fri, 10 Dec 2021, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 12:06:20PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Post Cursor2 was completely optional for the transmitter even before it
>> was deprecated.
>> 
>> And now we'd be adding 5 bytes extra to all link status reads. To fix
>> the only user of drm_dp_get_adjust_request_post_cursor() that apparently
>> has never worked as intended. I'm just not convinced.
>> 
>> I was trying to look through the implications of DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE
>> increase, and at least drm_dp_dpcd_read_phy_link_status() comes across
>> as something probably needing attention.
>
> Okay, it sounds like you'd prefer the "make it tegra-specific" patch I
> proposed. I will work that up as a proper patch and send it.

Yes. Of course, I'd like to hear Thierry's view as well.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/dp: Actually read Adjust Request Post Cursor2 register
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 11:34:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y24o7sry.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202112100853.FDB294B86@keescook>

On Fri, 10 Dec 2021, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 12:06:20PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Post Cursor2 was completely optional for the transmitter even before it
>> was deprecated.
>> 
>> And now we'd be adding 5 bytes extra to all link status reads. To fix
>> the only user of drm_dp_get_adjust_request_post_cursor() that apparently
>> has never worked as intended. I'm just not convinced.
>> 
>> I was trying to look through the implications of DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE
>> increase, and at least drm_dp_dpcd_read_phy_link_status() comes across
>> as something probably needing attention.
>
> Okay, it sounds like you'd prefer the "make it tegra-specific" patch I
> proposed. I will work that up as a proper patch and send it.

Yes. Of course, I'd like to hear Thierry's view as well.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-13  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-03  8:43 [PATCH] drm/dp: Actually read Adjust Request Post Cursor2 register Kees Cook
2021-12-03  8:43 ` Kees Cook
2021-12-08 11:19 ` Jani Nikula
2021-12-08 11:19   ` Jani Nikula
2021-12-09  5:54   ` Kees Cook
2021-12-09  5:54     ` Kees Cook
2021-12-09  6:23   ` Kees Cook
2021-12-09  6:23     ` Kees Cook
2021-12-09 22:20     ` Harry Wentland
2021-12-09 23:41       ` Kees Cook
2021-12-09 23:41         ` Kees Cook
2021-12-10 10:06         ` Jani Nikula
2021-12-10 16:53           ` Kees Cook
2021-12-10 16:53             ` Kees Cook
2021-12-13  9:34             ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-12-13  9:34               ` Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y24o7sry.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.