From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EEEC64E7B for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C92B206D9 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="DHWKaCBW" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726532AbgKXQxC (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:53:02 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:55337 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731531AbgKXQw7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:52:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1606236779; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EnlezwJ45zg2Qnp2D52xY62jIWVyx2m5sDtaGOEZsmE=; b=DHWKaCBWwSSEcZdrOPF+aKecQ5QUSPJPZAz2eXmtuvAWDbVkMe3ncKQ6fBwUBLb1bjHbNZ J1Uu26EhmyirBwH8hOxv17lSimFzymCob8V47fxTLTurpK43QMF62aCiVTCDJULgKjqRYf FmvI+0c9AdRs0QQoQz+GJWslD2oJeTM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-501-GQt14SafORukP-kwtuZrhA-1; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:52:56 -0500 X-MC-Unique: GQt14SafORukP-kwtuZrhA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2E361006C8D; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:52:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg2.str.redhat.com (ovpn-112-141.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.141]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30D8060BE5; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:52:50 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dev@opencontainers.org, corbet@lwn.net, Carlos O'Donell Subject: Re: [PATCH] syscalls: Document OCI seccomp filter interactions & workaround References: <87lfer2c0b.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20201124133719.GA30896@infradead.org> <87k0ua26gm.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20201124164659.GB14094@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:52:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20201124164659.GB14094@infradead.org> (Christoph Hellwig's message of "Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:46:59 +0000") Message-ID: <87y2iqzogv.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-api@vger.kernel.org * Christoph Hellwig: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 03:08:09PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> Do you categorically reject the general advice, or specific instances as >> well? > > All of the above. Really, if people decided to use seccompt to return > nonsensical error codes we should not work around that in new kernel > ABIs. Fair enough, I can work with that. Thanks. Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill