From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: carlos <carlos@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
paulmck <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
linux-api <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] rseq: Allow extending struct rseq
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:22:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y2nk29rp.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 2053637148.14136.1594818777608.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com
* Mathieu Desnoyers:
> Practically speaking, I suspect this would mean postponing availability of
> rseq for widely deployed applications for a few more years ?
There is no rseq support in GCC today, so you have to write assembler
code anyway.
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-15 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-14 3:03 [RFC PATCH 0/4] rseq: Introduce extensible struct rseq Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-14 3:03 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] selftests: rseq: Use fixed value as rseq_len parameter Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-14 3:03 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] rseq: Allow extending struct rseq Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-14 9:58 ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-14 12:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-14 13:00 ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-14 13:19 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-14 21:30 ` Carlos O'Donell
2020-07-15 13:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-15 13:22 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2020-07-15 13:31 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-15 13:42 ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-15 13:55 ` Christian Brauner
2020-07-15 14:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-15 14:54 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-15 14:58 ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-15 15:26 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-14 17:24 ` Peter Oskolkov
2020-07-14 17:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-14 18:33 ` Peter Oskolkov
2020-07-15 2:34 ` Chris Kennelly
2020-07-15 6:31 ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-15 10:59 ` Christian Brauner
2020-07-15 14:38 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-15 14:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-15 11:38 ` Christian Brauner
2020-07-15 12:33 ` Christian Brauner
2020-07-15 15:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-15 15:33 ` Christian Brauner
2020-07-14 3:03 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] selftests: rseq: define __rseq_abi with extensible size Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-14 3:03 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] selftests: rseq: print rseq extensible size in basic test Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-14 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] rseq: Introduce extensible struct rseq Carlos O'Donell
2020-07-15 13:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-16 13:39 ` Carlos O'Donell
2020-07-16 14:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-07-15 15:12 ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-15 15:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y2nk29rp.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.