diff for duplicates of <87y3kxrrc2.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 22c5dba..29cb1a4 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -3,18 +3,16 @@ Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> writes: >> >>> How should I split in separate patches ? Something like ? >>> 1/ Slice support for PPC32 > 2/ Activate slice for 8xx ->>=20 ->> Yes something like that. Will you=C2=A0 be able to avoid that ->> =C2=A0if (SLICE_NUM_HIGH) from the code? That makes the code ugly. Righ= -t now=20 +>> +>> Yes something like that. Will you be able to avoid that +>> if (SLICE_NUM_HIGH) from the code? That makes the code ugly. Right now >> i don't have definite suggestion on what we could do though. ->>=20 +>> > > Could use #ifdefs instead, but in my mind it would be even more ugly. > -> I would have liked just doing nothing, but the issue is that at the=20 -> moment bitmap_xxx() functions are not prepared to handle bitmaps of size= -=20 +> I would have liked just doing nothing, but the issue is that at the +> moment bitmap_xxx() functions are not prepared to handle bitmaps of size > zero. Should we try to change that ? Any chance to succeed ? > diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 8bfa452..c087d02 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -21,18 +21,16 @@ ">>\n" ">>> How should I split in separate patches ? Something like ?\n" ">>> 1/ Slice support for PPC32 > 2/ Activate slice for 8xx\n" - ">>=20\n" - ">> Yes something like that. Will you=C2=A0 be able to avoid that\n" - ">> =C2=A0if (SLICE_NUM_HIGH) from the code? That makes the code ugly. Righ=\n" - "t now=20\n" + ">> \n" + ">> Yes something like that. Will you\302\240 be able to avoid that\n" + ">> \302\240if (SLICE_NUM_HIGH) from the code? That makes the code ugly. Right now \n" ">> i don't have definite suggestion on what we could do though.\n" - ">>=20\n" + ">> \n" ">\n" "> Could use #ifdefs instead, but in my mind it would be even more ugly.\n" ">\n" - "> I would have liked just doing nothing, but the issue is that at the=20\n" - "> moment bitmap_xxx() functions are not prepared to handle bitmaps of size=\n" - "=20\n" + "> I would have liked just doing nothing, but the issue is that at the \n" + "> moment bitmap_xxx() functions are not prepared to handle bitmaps of size \n" "> zero. Should we try to change that ? Any chance to succeed ?\n" ">\n" "\n" @@ -44,4 +42,4 @@ "\n" -aneesh -a25622b341a516b5680d8e7d7ab278c22fc894d6b431abaa5383cf6e90e08aa0 +cbb6507b174beca4b0dcf3f82d90fc611f14be04a8c0bae82d2ddcdefefe9084
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.