From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49694) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwXsO-0001AX-V4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:13:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwXsK-0006lc-0E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:13:04 -0400 Received: from roura.ac.upc.es ([147.83.33.10]:44118) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwXsJ-0006lH-Kw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 14:12:59 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Llu=C3=ADs_Vilanova?= References: <1504729728-23279-1-git-send-email-cota@braap.org> <20170918145936.GE4141@stefanha-x1.localdomain> <20170919095142.GD22797@stefanha-x1.localdomain> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 21:12:45 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20170919095142.GD22797@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (Stefan Hajnoczi's message of "Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:51:42 +0100") Message-ID: <87y3p2ve8y.fsf@frigg.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/6] initial plugin support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Peter Maydell , "Emilio G. Cota" , QEMU Developers , Stefan Hajnoczi Stefan Hajnoczi writes: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:05:31PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 18 September 2017 at 15:59, Stefan Hajnoczi wrot= e: >> > Thanks for sending this! Could you and Llu=C3=ADs collaborate on a si= ngle >> > instrumentation plugin API? >> > >> > Let's have a discussion with Llu=C3=ADs, Peter, myself, and potentially >> > others then we can use the QEMU Developer Conference Call that is >> > scheduled every 2 weeks. >> > >> > The next call time slot is Tue 26 Sept at 13:00 UTC: >> > https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=3D20170926T1= 40000&p1=3D136 >>=20 >> I can't make that, I'm afraid, it's Linaro Connect that week. >>=20 >> From my point of view, it would be helpful to start with >> just designing the API that we're trying to implement. >> I care a lot that we get that API correct, I don't care much >> at all about the implementation... > That sounds good to me. > An RFC patch with just the header files would be enough for mailing list > discussion. No implementation is needed yet. I can send a stripped down version of this series only with the docs and pu= blic headers. But first I would like to know how to handle the translate/execute differentiation first (if it is indeed needed). Cheers, Lluis