From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52188) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXUJN-0004jw-De for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:21:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXUJM-0007Ic-My for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:21:21 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <1500385286-21142-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <1500385286-21142-4-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 17:21:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Eric Blake's message of "Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:54:09 -0500") Message-ID: <87y3rlrct2.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10 03/10] qapi: Introduce a first class 'null' type List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, quintela@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com Eric Blake writes: > On 07/18/2017 09:53 AM, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 07/18/2017 08:41 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> I expect the 'null' type to be useful mostly for members of alternate >>> types. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster >>> --- >> > >> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake > > Actually, do we need to update any qapi docs to mention the new builtin > type? Yes, we do. I'll give it a shot.