From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50233) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1chFgk-000786-Cx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 08:13:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1chFgc-0008GI-ET for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 08:13:34 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57614) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1chFgc-0008F5-3v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 08:13:26 -0500 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47B4BC067C1A for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:13:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <20170206173306.20603-3-dgilbert@redhat.com> (David Alan Gilbert's message of "Mon, 6 Feb 2017 17:32:52 +0000") References: <20170206173306.20603-1-dgilbert@redhat.com> <20170206173306.20603-3-dgilbert@redhat.com> Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:13:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87y3wvk9zn.fsf@emacs.mitica> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 02/16] postcopy: Transmit and compare individual page sizes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, aarcange@redhat.com "Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)" wrote: > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" > > When using postcopy with hugepages, we require the source > and destination page sizes for any RAMBlock to match; note > that different RAMBlocks in the same VM can have different > page sizes. > > Transmit them as part of the RAM information header and > fail if there's a difference. > > Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela I would preffer to add the field unconditionally for new machine types, but I don't have a good idea about how to do it :-( so...