All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm: Add definitions for DP compliance Video pattern tests
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 15:31:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y3y789cm.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484693835-32269-4-git-send-email-manasi.d.navare@intel.com>

On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> wrote:
> v2:
> * Add all the other DP Complianec TEST register defs (Jani Nikula)
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> ---
>  include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> index 0468135..ff03f8a 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> @@ -417,6 +417,64 @@
>  #define DP_TEST_LANE_COUNT		    0x220
>  
>  #define DP_TEST_PATTERN			    0x221
> +# define DP_NO_TEST_PATTERN                 (0x0)
> +# define DP_COLOR_RAMP                      (0x1)
> +# define DP_BLACK_AND_WHITE_VERTICAL_LINES  (0x2)
> +# define DP_COLOR_SQUARE                    (0x3)

The braces are unnecessary.

> +
> +#define DP_TEST_H_TOTAL_HI                  0x222
> +#define DP_TEST_H_TOTAl_LO                  0x223
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_V_TOTAL_HI                  0x224
> +#define DP_TEST_V_TOTAl_LO                  0x225
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_H_START_HI                  0x226
> +#define DP_TEST_H_START_LO                  0x227
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_V_START_HI                  0x228
> +#define DP_TEST_V_START_LO                  0x229
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_HSYNC_HI                    0x22A

You should add bit definitions for this, as bit 7 is polarity, and only
bits 6:0 are the hsync high order bits.

> +#define DP_TEST_HSYNC_LO                    0x22B
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_VSYNC_HI                    0x22C

Same as DP_TEST_HSYNC_HI.

> +#define DP_TEST_VSYNC_LO                    0x22D
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_H_WIDTH_HI                  0x22E
> +#define DP_TESt_H_WIDTH_LO                  0x22F
                 ^ should be T

> +
> +#define DP_TEST_V_HEIGHT_HI                 0x230
> +#define DP_TEST_V_HEIGHT_LO                 0x231
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_MISC_LO                     0x232

The other definitions have HI and LO because they contain a 15- or
16-bit value spread across two offsets. This is not the case here. I'd
call these DP_TEST_MISC0 and DP_TEST_MISC1.

> +# define DP_TEST_SYNC_CLOCK_MASK            (1 << 0)
> +# define DP_CLOCK_ASYNC                     (0x0)
> +# define DP_CLOCK_SYNC                      (0x1)

Single-bit values should just be TEST_SYNCHRONOUS_CLOCK (1 << 0). No
masks, shifts or values.

> +# define DP_TEST_COLOR_FORMAT_MASK          (3 << 1)
> +# define DP_TEST_COLOR_FORMAT_SHIFT         1
> +# define DP_COLOR_FORMAT_RGB                (0x0)
> +# define DP_COLOR_FORMAT_YCbCr422           (0x1)
> +# define DP_COLOR_FORMAT_YCbCr444           (0x2)

The values should be shifted to the right position,
e.g. DP_COLOR_FORMAT_RGB (0 << 1). The usage pattern would be:

	if ((x & DP_TEST_COLOR_FORMAT_MASK) == DP_COLOR_FORMAT_RGB)

or

	x &= ~DP_TEST_COLOR_FORMAT_MASK;
        x |= DP_COLOR_FORMAT_YCbCr422;

> +# define DP_TEST_DYNAMIC_RANGE_MASK         (1 << 3)
> +# define DP_TEST_DYNAMIC_RANGE_SHIFT        3

Single-bit values should just be DP_TEST_DYNAMIC_RANGE (1 << 3).

Same for all of the defines below.

BR,
Jani.

> +# define DP_VESA_RANGE                      (0x0)
> +# define DP_CEA_RANGE                       (0x1)
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_MASK             (7 << 5)
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_SHIFT            5
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_6                (0x0)
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_8                (0x1)
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_10               (0x2)
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_12               (0x3)
> +# define DP_TEST_BIT_DEPTH_16               (0x4)
> +#define DP_TEST_MISC_HI                     0x233
> +# define DP_TEST_REFRESH_DENOMINATOR_MASK   (1 << 0)
> +# define REFRESH_DENOMINATOR_1              (0x0)
> +# define REFRESH_DENOMINATOR_1_001          (0x1)
> +# define DP_TEST_INTERLACED_MASK            (1 << 1)
> +# define DP_NON_INTERLACED                  (0x0)
> +# define DP_INTERLACED                      (0x1)
> +
> +#define DP_TEST_REFRESH_RATE_NUMERATOR      0x234
>  
>  #define DP_TEST_CRC_R_CR		    0x240
>  #define DP_TEST_CRC_G_Y			    0x242

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-19 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-17 22:57 [PATCH 0/4] Add Automation Support for DP Compliance Testing (Rev 4) Manasi Navare
2017-01-17 22:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Add support for DP link training compliance Manasi Navare
2017-01-18 17:29   ` Manasi Navare
2017-01-19 15:51   ` Jani Nikula
2017-01-17 22:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Fixes to support DP Compliance EDID tests Manasi Navare
2017-01-18 17:32   ` Manasi Navare
2017-01-17 22:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm: Add definitions for DP compliance Video pattern tests Manasi Navare
2017-01-18 17:35   ` Manasi Navare
2017-01-19 13:31   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-01-17 22:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Add support for DP Video pattern compliance tests Manasi Navare
2017-01-18 17:37   ` Manasi Navare
2017-01-17 23:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Add Automation Support for DP Compliance Testing (Rev 4) Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-01-20  6:23 [PATCH 0/4] Add Automation Support for DP Compliance (Rev 5) Manasi Navare
2017-01-20  6:23 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm: Add definitions for DP compliance Video pattern tests Manasi Navare
2017-01-20 15:33   ` Jani Nikula
2017-01-20 16:13     ` Manasi Navare
2017-01-20 16:28       ` Jani Nikula
2017-01-21  3:09 [PATCH 0/4] Add automation support for DP Compliance (Rev 6) Manasi Navare
2017-01-21  3:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm: Add definitions for DP compliance Video pattern tests Manasi Navare
2017-01-24 16:05   ` Jani Nikula

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y3y789cm.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.