From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: "Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/dsi: merge pre_pll_enable hook to pre_enable
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 12:59:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y4df69ct.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151130083300.GN17050@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 01:26:40PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 12:21:44PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> > For DSI, the pre_pll_enable and the pre_enable hooks are called
>> > back-to-back on all platforms that support DSI. The distinction is
>> > artificial for DSI, for which we enable the DSI PLL in the encoder
>> > hooks. Do everything in pre_enable, and remove DSI pre_pll_enable hook.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>
>> I was eyeing this same thing at some point.
>>
>> For the series:
>> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Yeah, all the pretties in here!
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>
> Btw about bxt dsi I wonder whether we should partially merge this with the
> cpu transcoder (since it's only either that or a dsi encoder aparrently).
> At least I remember that we still had some issues with bxt's
> dsi_get_hw_state?
One step at a time, maybe as a follow-up. I'm kind of hesitant to
conflate this with cpu transcoder, in case some new platform changes the
rules.
So for now, I've pushed this to drm-intel-next-queued, thanks for the
reviews.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Cheers, Daniel
>
>>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 16 +++++-----------
>> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
>> > index efb5a27dd49c..08c46c49c481 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
>> > @@ -462,6 +462,8 @@ static void intel_dsi_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>> > intel_panel_enable_backlight(intel_dsi->attached_connector);
>> > }
>> >
>> > +static void intel_dsi_prepare(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder);
>> > +
>> > static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>> > {
>> > struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
>> > @@ -474,6 +476,9 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>> >
>> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
>> >
>> > + intel_dsi_prepare(encoder);
>> > + intel_enable_dsi_pll(encoder);
>> > +
>> > /* Panel Enable over CRC PMIC */
>> > if (intel_dsi->gpio_panel)
>> > gpiod_set_value_cansleep(intel_dsi->gpio_panel, 1);
>> > @@ -1026,15 +1031,6 @@ static void intel_dsi_prepare(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder)
>> > }
>> > }
>> >
>> > -static void intel_dsi_pre_pll_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>> > -{
>> > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
>> > -
>> > - intel_dsi_prepare(encoder);
>> > - intel_enable_dsi_pll(encoder);
>> > -
>> > -}
>> > -
>> > static enum drm_connector_status
>> > intel_dsi_detect(struct drm_connector *connector, bool force)
>> > {
>> > @@ -1154,9 +1150,7 @@ void intel_dsi_init(struct drm_device *dev)
>> >
>> > drm_encoder_init(dev, encoder, &intel_dsi_funcs, DRM_MODE_ENCODER_DSI);
>> >
>> > - /* XXX: very likely not all of these are needed */
>> > intel_encoder->compute_config = intel_dsi_compute_config;
>> > - intel_encoder->pre_pll_enable = intel_dsi_pre_pll_enable;
>> > intel_encoder->pre_enable = intel_dsi_pre_enable;
>> > intel_encoder->enable = intel_dsi_enable_nop;
>> > intel_encoder->disable = intel_dsi_pre_disable;
>> > --
>> > 2.1.4
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Intel-gfx mailing list
>> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>>
>> --
>> Ville Syrjälä
>> Intel OTC
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-30 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-27 10:21 [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/dsi: merge pre_pll_enable hook to pre_enable Jani Nikula
2015-11-27 10:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: remove pre_pll_enable hook from DDI/gen9+ crtc enable Jani Nikula
2015-11-27 10:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: add has_dsi_encoder to crtc state Jani Nikula
2015-11-27 11:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/dsi: merge pre_pll_enable hook to pre_enable Ville Syrjälä
2015-11-30 8:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-11-30 10:59 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y4df69ct.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.