From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WkubB-0004UM-KR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2014 08:17:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WkubA-0007V8-Qr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2014 08:17:21 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27675) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WkubA-0007Uy-IA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2014 08:17:20 -0400 From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <1400095810-27684-18-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> (Eduardo Habkost's message of "Wed, 14 May 2014 16:30:09 -0300") References: <1400095810-27684-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> <1400095810-27684-18-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 14:17:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87y4y38ce0.fsf@elfo.mitica> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND v4 17/18] target-i386: block migration and savevm if invariant tsc is exposed Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eduardo Habkost Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= Eduardo Habkost wrote: > From: Marcelo Tosatti > > Invariant TSC documentation mentions that "invariant TSC will run at a > constant rate in all ACPI P-, C-. and T-states". > > This is not the case if migration to a host with different TSC frequency > is allowed, or if savevm is performed. So block migration/savevm. > > Cc: Juan Quintela > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti > Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela I don't have a better suggestion. Really we could allow migration to identical machines, but I assume that there is not a way to read the tsc frequency? (Althought reading the model name/numbers could be enough?) I.e. Add a subsection that includes the cpu model name, or whatever we can have to identify the host cpu? Later, Juan.