From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Mention "git blame" improvements in release notes
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:39:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y4yp4ame.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqzjj5s8hs.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:51:11 -0700")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> Thanks, but no thanks---I do not see it tasteful.
>>
>> Well, begging rarely is....
>> ...
>> If that's not worth anything to the Git community,...
>
> Concurred on the first point. If you thought in any way I meant
> to say that blame improvements do not matter, then I am sorry, I did
> not mean that.
>
> But still, I am not convinced that the release notes is a good place
> to do this, and would be happier if you can think of a better venue.
"This change has been contributed by an independent developer on a
contingency base. To make this approach work, please contact him if you
consider it worth recompensating."
This sort of text can be placed in the commit message (where it will be
mostly visible to actual other developers) and in the "What's cooking"
reports while, well, it's cooking. It won't reach the mass of "ordinary
users", but while they are quite a large audience, they are also least
likely to care enough about isolated performance changes. And while it
will be a limited run, "What's cooking" is also read by non-developers.
Those are the two venues I can currently think of that would seem
"scalable", at least with a text of that size. Namely where it would
not become quite a total nuisance (though naturally less effective) if
everybody tried doing the same.
--
David Kastrup
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-28 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-25 23:56 [PATCH 1/2] blame: large-scale performance rewrite David Kastrup
2014-04-25 23:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] Mention "git blame" improvements in release notes David Kastrup
2014-04-26 17:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-26 18:28 ` David Kastrup
[not found] ` <xmqqzjj5s8hs.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
2014-04-28 17:39 ` David Kastrup [this message]
2014-04-28 19:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-28 19:57 ` David Kastrup
2014-04-28 20:05 ` Ronnie Sahlberg
2014-04-28 20:26 ` David Kastrup
2014-04-26 0:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] blame: large-scale performance rewrite Shawn Pearce
2014-04-26 7:48 ` David Kastrup
2014-04-26 16:01 ` Shawn Pearce
2014-04-26 16:50 ` David Kastrup
2014-04-26 17:09 ` Shawn Pearce
2014-04-26 17:22 ` David Kastrup
2014-04-26 17:02 ` David Kastrup
2014-04-26 17:30 ` David Kastrup
2014-04-26 17:56 ` Shawn Pearce
2014-04-26 21:39 ` David Kastrup
2014-04-27 17:53 ` Shawn Pearce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y4yp4ame.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.