From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Kastrup Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Mention "git blame" improvements in release notes Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:39:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87y4yp4ame.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <1398470210-28746-1-git-send-email-dak@gnu.org> <1398470210-28746-2-git-send-email-dak@gnu.org> <7vmwf8huey.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <87zjj86j4a.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 28 21:12:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WeqyE-00085L-3Y for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:12:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753873AbaD1TLb (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:11:31 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:41432 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753834AbaD1TL2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:11:28 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38946 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WepWD-0000i7-UC; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:39:06 -0400 Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7C097E05FE; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 19:39:05 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:51:11 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > David Kastrup writes: > >>> Thanks, but no thanks---I do not see it tasteful. >> >> Well, begging rarely is.... >> ... >> If that's not worth anything to the Git community,... > > Concurred on the first point. If you thought in any way I meant > to say that blame improvements do not matter, then I am sorry, I did > not mean that. > > But still, I am not convinced that the release notes is a good place > to do this, and would be happier if you can think of a better venue. "This change has been contributed by an independent developer on a contingency base. To make this approach work, please contact him if you consider it worth recompensating." This sort of text can be placed in the commit message (where it will be mostly visible to actual other developers) and in the "What's cooking" reports while, well, it's cooking. It won't reach the mass of "ordinary users", but while they are quite a large audience, they are also least likely to care enough about isolated performance changes. And while it will be a limited run, "What's cooking" is also read by non-developers. Those are the two venues I can currently think of that would seem "scalable", at least with a text of that size. Namely where it would not become quite a total nuisance (though naturally less effective) if everybody tried doing the same. -- David Kastrup