From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] virtio: change to_vp_device to an inlined definition
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 09:51:49 +1030
Message-ID: <87y5hcf5ki.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
References: <1354691009-25966-1-git-send-email-gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <1354691009-25966-1-git-send-email-gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/>
List-Post: <mailto:virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
To: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, mst@redhat.com
List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org

Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com> writes:

> to_vp_device is worth changing to inlined definition.

Why?

Thanks,
Rusty.