From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, zab@redhat.com, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: Prevent race while waling extent tree
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 16:27:20 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y5ibm05z.fsf@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352457533-11642-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com>
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 11:38:53 +0100, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> wrote:
> Currently ext4_ext_walk_space() only takes i_data_sem for read when
> searching for the extent at given block with ext4_ext_find_extent().
> Then it drops the lock and the extent tree can be changed at will.
> However later on we're searching for the 'next' extent, but the extent
> tree might already have changed, so the information might not be
> accurate.
>
> In fact we can hit BUG_ON(end <= start) if the extent got inserted into
> the tree after the one we found and before the block we were searching
> for. This has been reproduced by running xfstests 225 in loop on s390x
> architecture, but theoretically we could hit this on any other
> architecture as well, but probably not as often.
>
> ext4_ext_walk_space() is currently only used from ext4_fiemap().
>
> Fix this by extending the critical section to include
> ext4_ext_next_allocated_block() as well. It means that if there are any
> operation going on on the particular inode, the fiemap will return
> inaccurate data. However this will also fix the concerns about starving
> writers to the extent tree, because we will put and reacquire the
> semaphore with every iteration. This will not be particularly fast, but
> fiemap is not critical operation.
See comments below
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2: Extend the critical section rather than put the whole function under
> the lock.
>
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index 7011ac9..d444281 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -1978,7 +1978,6 @@ static int ext4_ext_walk_space(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t block,
> /* find extent for this block */
> down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> path = ext4_ext_find_extent(inode, block, path);
> - up_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> if (IS_ERR(path)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(path);
> path = NULL;
First of all: you should drop i_data_sem here, and in all other error
handlers
> @@ -1993,6 +1992,7 @@ static int ext4_ext_walk_space(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t block,
> }
> ex = path[depth].p_ext;
> next = ext4_ext_next_allocated_block(path);
> + up_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
>
> exists = 0;
> if (!ex) {
> --
> 1.7.7.6
Also i believe that BUG_ON is still possible because after you drop
i_data_sem, path[depth].p_ext may contains semi-random data
(for example after i_depth change) so your previous fix was more
intrusive, but 100% safe. IMHO it is safe to drop sem a bit later
right after you have finished with 'path' on current iteration
for example like this(caution i'm not test this patch):
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 7011ac9..2d2d2af 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -1978,10 +1978,10 @@ static int ext4_ext_walk_space(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t block,
/* find extent for this block */
down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
path = ext4_ext_find_extent(inode, block, path);
- up_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
if (IS_ERR(path)) {
err = PTR_ERR(path);
path = NULL;
+ up_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
break;
}
@@ -1989,6 +1989,7 @@ static int ext4_ext_walk_space(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t block,
if (unlikely(path[depth].p_hdr == NULL)) {
EXT4_ERROR_INODE(inode, "path[%d].p_hdr == NULL", depth);
err = -EIO;
+ up_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
break;
}
ex = path[depth].p_ext;
@@ -2028,6 +2029,8 @@ static int ext4_ext_walk_space(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t block,
BUG();
}
BUG_ON(end <= start);
+ up_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
+ BUG_ON(end <= start);
if (!exists) {
cbex.ec_block = start;
@@ -2045,7 +2048,6 @@ static int ext4_ext_walk_space(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t block,
break;
}
err = func(inode, next, &cbex, ex, cbdata);
- ext4_ext_drop_refs(path);
if (err < 0)
break;
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-09 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-09 10:38 [PATCH v2] ext4: Prevent race while waling extent tree Lukas Czerner
2012-11-09 12:27 ` Dmitry Monakhov [this message]
2012-11-09 14:03 ` Lukáš Czerner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y5ibm05z.fsf@openvz.org \
--to=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zab@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.