Re: Ping.

[Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>]

Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> writes:

> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:00:58PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
>> Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org> writes:
>> 
>> > This is 6'th version of extened inode owner patch-set.
>> > Please review it tell me what do you think about all this.
>> >  Are you agree with this approach?
>> >  Are you worry about some implementation details?
>> >  Is it ready for merge to some devel's tree?
>> Ping. I haven't got response about the patchset, just small note about
>> xattr-name from Andreas.
>> Please clarify what do you think about whole idea and
>> current patch-set state. What do i have to do to make a progress?
>
> As long as you still have the awkward ifdefs and different semantics for
About ifdefs style:
How can i avoid CONFIG_PROJECT_ID without bloating inode size?
embedded people will kill me for this.
I just act similar quota code, or you want protect prjid logic 
via quota config option?
I don't remember, are we already talk about this?
If so please remind me your vision.
> "isolation" vs "not"  there's still a NACK from me.  But in the end Al
> will have to decide if he wants to take your patches or not.