From: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: cgd@broadcom.com, David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:39:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y8mdgryp.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0406222304340.23178@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> (Maciej W. Rozycki's message of "Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:30:48 +0200 (CEST)")
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> writes:
> Or should we get rid of the 20-bit "break" completely? The two-argument
> version provides the same functionality, although the 10-bit codes to be
> used do not map to the 20-bit equivalent "optically" very well.
> Especially if decimal notation is used.
I notice no-one's really responded to this question yet. FWIW, on gut
instinct, I'd personally prefer to drop the 20-bit break than introduce
a new, non-standard name for it.
Just an opinion though. I won't argue against anyone saying different. ;)
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-24 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-11 18:10 [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP David Daney
2004-06-11 18:12 ` David Daney
2004-06-11 18:20 ` David Daney
2004-06-11 19:12 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
[not found] ` <mailpost.1086981251.16853@news-sj1-1>
2004-06-11 19:27 ` cgd
2004-06-11 19:50 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-06-11 20:51 ` David Daney
2004-06-11 21:10 ` [Patch] (revised patch) " David Daney
2004-06-13 8:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-06-14 12:52 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-06-22 21:30 ` [Patch] " Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-06-23 19:30 ` David Daney
2004-06-23 19:38 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-06-24 10:39 ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2004-06-24 18:34 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
[not found] ` <mailpost.1088102121.25381@news-sj1-1>
2004-06-24 18:46 ` cgd
2004-06-28 13:46 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-28 15:19 cgd
2004-06-28 15:36 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-07-19 14:21 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
[not found] ` <mailpost.1090246948.15046@news-sj1-1>
2004-07-19 15:19 ` cgd
2004-07-19 15:42 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-07-19 23:29 ` Thiemo Seufer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y8mdgryp.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=rsandifo@redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=cgd@broadcom.com \
--cc=ddaney@avtrex.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.