All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, harisokn@amazon.com, cl@gentwo.org,
	ast@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
	memxor@gmail.com, zhenglifeng1@huawei.com,
	xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/12] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout()
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2026 01:06:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zf6nnoiv.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aWAjU_QS7kwcyCse@willie-the-truck>


Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> writes:

> On Sun, Dec 14, 2025 at 08:49:09PM -0800, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> Support waiting in smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() via
>> __cmpwait_relaxed(). To ensure that we wake from waiting in
>> WFE periodically and don't block forever if there are no stores
>> to ptr, this path is only used when the event-stream is enabled.
>>
>> Note that when using __cmpwait_relaxed() we ignore the timeout
>> value, allowing an overshoot by upto the event-stream period.
>> And, in the unlikely event that the event-stream is unavailable,
>> fallback to spin-waiting.
>>
>> Also set SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT to 1 so we do the time-check in
>> each iteration of smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout().
>>
>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes:
>>    - cpu_poll_relax() now takes an additional parameter.
>>
>>    - added a comment detailing why we define SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT=1 and
>>      how it ties up with smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout().
>>
>>    - explicitly include <asm/vdso/processor.h> for cpu_relax().
>>
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
>> index 9495c4441a46..6190e178db51 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/kasan-checks.h>
>>
>>  #include <asm/alternative-macros.h>
>> +#include <asm/vdso/processor.h>
>>
>>  #define __nops(n)	".rept	" #n "\nnop\n.endr\n"
>>  #define nops(n)		asm volatile(__nops(n))
>> @@ -219,6 +220,26 @@ do {									\
>>  	(typeof(*ptr))VAL;						\
>>  })
>>
>> +/* Re-declared here to avoid include dependency. */
>> +extern bool arch_timer_evtstrm_available(void);
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * In the common case, cpu_poll_relax() sits waiting in __cmpwait_relaxed()
>> + * for the ptr value to change.
>> + *
>> + * Since this period is reasonably long, choose SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT
>> + * to be 1, so smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() does a
>> + * time-check in each iteration.
>> + */
>> +#define SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT	1
>> +
>> +#define cpu_poll_relax(ptr, val, timeout_ns) do {			\
>> +	if (arch_timer_evtstrm_available())				\
>> +		__cmpwait_relaxed(ptr, val);				\
>> +	else								\
>> +		cpu_relax();						\
>> +} while (0)
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Thanks!

--
ankur

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-09  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-15  4:49 [PATCH v8 00/12] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-12-15  4:49 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-12-22  7:47   ` Ankur Arora
2025-12-15  4:49 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-01-08 21:36   ` Will Deacon
2026-01-09  9:06     ` Ankur Arora [this message]
2025-12-15  4:49 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] arm64/delay: move some constants out to a separate header Ankur Arora
2025-12-15 17:59   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-19  4:52   ` kernel test robot
2025-12-15  4:49 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] arm64: support WFET in smp_cond_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-01-08 21:35   ` Will Deacon
2026-01-09  9:05     ` Ankur Arora
2026-01-09 14:16       ` Will Deacon
2026-01-09 18:55         ` Ankur Arora
2026-01-09 14:17   ` Will Deacon
2026-01-09 19:05     ` Ankur Arora
2026-01-20 13:58       ` Will Deacon
2026-01-20 22:49         ` Ankur Arora
2025-12-15  4:49 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2025-12-15  5:14   ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-12-15  4:49 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-12-15  4:49 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-01-09 14:11   ` Will Deacon
2026-01-09 19:06     ` Ankur Arora
2025-12-15  4:49 ` [PATCH v8 08/12] locking/atomic: scripts: build atomic_long_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-12-15  4:49 ` [PATCH v8 09/12] bpf/rqspinlock: switch check_timeout() to a clock interface Ankur Arora
2025-12-15  4:49 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] bpf/rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-12-15 21:40   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-12-16  7:34     ` Ankur Arora
2025-12-15  4:49 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] sched: add need-resched timed wait interface Ankur Arora
2025-12-15  4:49 ` [PATCH v8 12/12] cpuidle/poll_state: Wait for need-resched via tif_need_resched_relaxed_wait() Ankur Arora
2025-12-15 11:11   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-16  6:55     ` Ankur Arora
2025-12-15 21:23   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zf6nnoiv.fsf@oracle.com \
    --to=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=harisokn@amazon.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.