From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15006307AC9; Wed, 2 Jul 2025 23:03:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751497437; cv=none; b=JU3R9gmSW2/LhbetitDy1S7fl+7XeWYidV6iP0P6bCoHvIe5NLiJ+q1p+oXVTnKgC+wXUq4xziw9w7VYlefgpfqukpKs7QAAoijghSiJtrscTTyDrxU29qp3CkXsOGjPe04G3d7qiTOcxgzddKY9xq5KybcNlmhY2etPoGBHFRQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751497437; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ucS+ilPG2rYTNnJTv1Bwp+mKTBAYZCfog9NWyr6zRJU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hYcwyKLm2xP/baAOUtqieElJ4OciAeni859FMj+z4G53dwEKdlNBaiEwhp9X3TCDZ+sAu0wIN4JgLnab1gNGR2TI1alP4OGpjVL23t6M6qNFW/zUnSFm3YQNM1uIF/PcUY2DwFW+wDGqwcly2Hc2gx58hdXwAdKFIpT4cyHxT5s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=KDbILQNl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="KDbILQNl" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 0F070406FC DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1751497435; bh=4nYCxkfW4OyMor8Fbo8TDqknIZPFGI22sOuPRVnexJs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=KDbILQNlKL6nTqESrMis5Plnasrq9CF0XEi1M9lyI2wk++yQDvh+YMgW7J0s4aGET lGeS0kplvT7Y8y5M1bOXv+6DmSxu4mdYPkt9WxZ1Y59IOYSElq8Gbvwrz3DGMEkXiC aiy0IigfSW0EbuYa8zDDlxiY8cljTFZgZ8+GMKYLwqG8d2JGggZfsZhrz928jixI7M mWKS3Dj1poa0bvslA6xmhCpgnMm8HMRVynnvEYdEzXCHENPxLp7UH7FZRNAH0SCx5P hv8Yh5Ae5TAFTpMDAy0EpoBT196ZQyPoaxeyLr8N1kDt1MbYSIvw9+nLgRdgO4t2aZ KcaOJpWIyBHNg== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F070406FC; Wed, 2 Jul 2025 23:03:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Akira Yokosawa , Sai Vishnu M Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] Translate sphinx-pre-install to Python In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 17:03:54 -0600 Message-ID: <87zfdmmbz9.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > Hi Jon, > > This series port scripts/sphinx-pre-install to Python. It started as > a bug-compatible version with the old logic. In my limited testing this seems to work just fine ... Unless somebody comes up with a problem, I don't see a lot of reasons to not apply it. Thanks, jon