Re: [PATCH] net: phy: qt2025: Fix hardware revision check comment

[Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@posteo.net>]

FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com> writes:

> On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 23:53:50 +0000
> Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@posteo.net> wrote:
>
>> Correct the hardware revision check comment in the QT2025 driver. The
>> revision value was documented as 0x3b instead of the correct 0xb3,
>> which matches the actual comparison logic in the code.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@posteo.net>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/phy/qt2025.rs | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/qt2025.rs b/drivers/net/phy/qt2025.rs
>> index 1ab065798175b4f54c5f2fd6c871ba2942c48bf1..7e754d5d71544c6d6b6a6d90416a5a130ba76108 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/qt2025.rs
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/qt2025.rs
>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ impl Driver for PhyQT2025 {
>>  
>>      fn probe(dev: &mut phy::Device) -> Result<()> {
>>          // Check the hardware revision code.
>> -        // Only 0x3b works with this driver and firmware.
>> +        // Only 0xb3 works with this driver and firmware.
>>          let hw_rev = dev.read(C45::new(Mmd::PMAPMD, 0xd001))?;
>>          if (hw_rev >> 8) != 0xb3 {
>>              return Err(code::ENODEV);
>
> Oops,
>
> Reviewed-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
>
> Given that this patch is expected to be merged via netdev, you might
> need to resend with a proper subject:
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.13/source/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst

Hi Fujita,

Very helpful; didn't think to check the Networking subsystem workflow
docs.

Thanks,
C. Mitrodimas

>
> Thanks,