From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
To: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@kernel.org>,
"Miri Korenblit" <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>,
"Johannes Berg" <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
"Emmanuel Grumbach" <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>,
"Gregory Greenman" <gregory.greenman@intel.com>,
"Daniel Gabay" <daniel.gabay@intel.com>,
"Benjamin Berg" <benjamin.berg@intel.com>,
"Ilan Peer" <ilan.peer@intel.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: work around -Wenum-compare-conditional warning
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 10:30:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zfmx3ocf.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d78b5354-b265-4e45-9a6a-996273026402@app.fastmail.com> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:07:05 +0000")
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024, at 16:06, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> writes:
>>
>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>>
>>> This is one of only three -Wenum-compare-conditional warnings we get
>>> in randconfig builds:
>>>
>>> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/sta.c:4331:17: error: conditional expression between different enumeration types ('enum iwl_fw_sta_type' and 'enum iwl_sta_type') [-Werror,-Wenum-compare-conditional]
>>> 4331 | u32 type = mld ? STATION_TYPE_PEER : IWL_STA_LINK;
>>> | ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> This is a false positive since the code works as intended, but the
>>> warning is otherwise sensible, so slightly rewrite it in order to
>>> not trigger the warning.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>
>> Is this and the other rtw89 patch for current release or -next?
>
> Up to you, the warning has existed for a long time at W=1
> level, so the patch applies to current and stable kernels
> as well, but it's not a regression or particularly important.
Ok, I guess -next is more approriate then.
> It would be nice to turn on the warning by default in 6.13
> once the three patches I sent get applied.
It's not certain if driver specific trees make it to v6.13 so should the
patches applied directly to wireless-next?
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-21 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-18 15:18 [PATCH] iwlwifi: work around -Wenum-compare-conditional warning Arnd Bergmann
2024-10-18 16:06 ` Kalle Valo
2024-10-18 19:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-10-21 7:30 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zfmx3ocf.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=benjamin.berg@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.gabay@intel.com \
--cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
--cc=gregory.greenman@intel.com \
--cc=ilan.peer@intel.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.