From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CDA3C3DA4A for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:14:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sh8ZO-0000hp-Ho; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:13:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sh8ZL-0000h5-Gh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:13:44 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sh8ZJ-0005lX-T6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:13:43 -0400 Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BF33224EA; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:13:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1724336019; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EX6kwZrdehSDdbgo+cmLIAYAkADpQrV6RnSsMfiZyHE=; b=eNnXqZ8LB642bnvldU3x+cWMe3zS9zaFmy7Uwoqns5sWYHAKT92Bz6VQ0pjeZpXQGusMgN qiTMtYur2nhIcRsEJrvHN2CUfLaDRPcHQOmlesuwPgQBNNf2g7EAhgBaTodTJQ4ijVrG+q M/fhsXIX/AjWI4ms1VRe8No2EYEEsYU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1724336019; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EX6kwZrdehSDdbgo+cmLIAYAkADpQrV6RnSsMfiZyHE=; b=KFUOAi9L2Q8rJRe8VpYwv4ExiD8Jr5RADZ9/3f+1nJ6j8Mxn4kaUyoXJDhCjEuYCN34aQ9 /w5cnXxoPfr7HGCw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=eNnXqZ8L; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=KFUOAi9L DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1724336019; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EX6kwZrdehSDdbgo+cmLIAYAkADpQrV6RnSsMfiZyHE=; b=eNnXqZ8LB642bnvldU3x+cWMe3zS9zaFmy7Uwoqns5sWYHAKT92Bz6VQ0pjeZpXQGusMgN qiTMtYur2nhIcRsEJrvHN2CUfLaDRPcHQOmlesuwPgQBNNf2g7EAhgBaTodTJQ4ijVrG+q M/fhsXIX/AjWI4ms1VRe8No2EYEEsYU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1724336019; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EX6kwZrdehSDdbgo+cmLIAYAkADpQrV6RnSsMfiZyHE=; b=KFUOAi9L2Q8rJRe8VpYwv4ExiD8Jr5RADZ9/3f+1nJ6j8Mxn4kaUyoXJDhCjEuYCN34aQ9 /w5cnXxoPfr7HGCw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D776D139D3; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id uidKJpJHx2ZMXAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:13:38 +0000 From: Fabiano Rosas To: Peter Xu Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Maciej S . Szmigiero" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/14] migration/multifd: Isolate ram pages packet data In-Reply-To: References: <20240801123516.4498-1-farosas@suse.de> <20240801123516.4498-10-farosas@suse.de> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 11:13:36 -0300 Message-ID: <87zfp4y7an.fsf@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8BF33224EA X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.47 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-1.96)[94.79%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-0.999]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.de:+] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1; envelope-from=farosas@suse.de; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Peter Xu writes: > On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 09:35:11AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote: >> @@ -1554,7 +1577,6 @@ static void *multifd_recv_thread(void *opaque) >> qemu_sem_wait(&p->sem_sync); >> } >> } else { >> - p->total_normal_pages += p->data->size / qemu_target_page_size(); > > Is this line dropped by accident? > No, this was just used in the tracepoint below. I stopped including this information there. >> p->data->size = 0; >> /* >> * Order data->size update before clearing