From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD215C25B7A for ; Wed, 22 May 2024 13:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s9lgG-0001Mg-46; Wed, 22 May 2024 09:06:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s9lgE-0001MH-H5; Wed, 22 May 2024 09:06:54 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([195.135.223.130]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s9lg9-0004sj-31; Wed, 22 May 2024 09:06:53 -0400 Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5189134D3F; Wed, 22 May 2024 13:06:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1716383201; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pT0F6m5SKzZGAG/o/+8IPDTbtu2dgZqK2wCjsdg1spc=; b=mMtJPHpaT8FPfy8drgjxXBG0/w61zRdNKvsFD3TwxlWeTn9Bt1E4KXEkd+wkub4e/YlXxt gc6BqbTdnJJcBRinQF5alu1chkZJfeboPBUWbV2qDSCIWZzFHGSQmHtAveKRamRufsV5IH ADIEEKySssOAOIZfhFDFjEUXWzTYDj8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1716383201; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pT0F6m5SKzZGAG/o/+8IPDTbtu2dgZqK2wCjsdg1spc=; b=+5hp1cLi46muS9026iRO2ZG84JwpzQv+1fPj3GBmojAfltwrLvYOKbaPNWsa5pTktMS3GR jyrixdyrIyf/j/Bg== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=mMtJPHpa; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=+5hp1cLi DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1716383201; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pT0F6m5SKzZGAG/o/+8IPDTbtu2dgZqK2wCjsdg1spc=; b=mMtJPHpaT8FPfy8drgjxXBG0/w61zRdNKvsFD3TwxlWeTn9Bt1E4KXEkd+wkub4e/YlXxt gc6BqbTdnJJcBRinQF5alu1chkZJfeboPBUWbV2qDSCIWZzFHGSQmHtAveKRamRufsV5IH ADIEEKySssOAOIZfhFDFjEUXWzTYDj8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1716383201; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pT0F6m5SKzZGAG/o/+8IPDTbtu2dgZqK2wCjsdg1spc=; b=+5hp1cLi46muS9026iRO2ZG84JwpzQv+1fPj3GBmojAfltwrLvYOKbaPNWsa5pTktMS3GR jyrixdyrIyf/j/Bg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0A8813A1E; Wed, 22 May 2024 13:06:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 0c2nJeDtTWbdUQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 22 May 2024 13:06:40 +0000 From: Fabiano Rosas To: Thomas Huth , Peter Xu , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/qtest/migration-test: Run some basic tests on s390x and ppc64 with TCG, too In-Reply-To: <20240522091255.417263-1-thuth@redhat.com> References: <20240522091255.417263-1-thuth@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 10:06:38 -0300 Message-ID: <87zfsigfmp.fsf@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.45 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-2.94)[99.73%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns,suse.de:dkim,suse.de:email]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.de:+] X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5189134D3F X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org Received-SPF: pass client-ip=195.135.223.130; envelope-from=farosas@suse.de; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Thomas Huth writes: > On s390x, we recently had a regression that broke migration / savevm > (see commit bebe9603fc ("hw/intc/s390_flic: Fix crash that occurs when > saving the machine state"). The problem was merged without being noticed > since we currently do not run any migration / savevm related tests on > x86 hosts. > While we currently cannot run all migration tests for the s390x target > on x86 hosts yet (due to some unresolved issues with TCG), we can at > least run some of the non-live tests to avoid such problems in the future. > Thus enable the "analyze-script" and the "bad_dest" tests before checking > for KVM on s390x or ppc64 (this also fixes the problem that the > "analyze-script" test was not run on s390x at all anymore since it got > disabled again by accident in a previous refactoring of the code). > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas And thanks for fixing my mistake.