From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 088F5C3DA6E for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 11:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1293110E5D7; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 11:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 977FF10E5D6; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 11:41:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1704454918; x=1735990918; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=AIqKrJa1Ir72muVTZKMCEU6U6ADnPC25ZR4ehwhrhgU=; b=JKqtMYa6SbYs6SF0IrY2t0AtshRNywQZ3hBHVLc6wyL+qz0cGq/vq6BG lU2TjKrS31b6zjXz7CJ/1nVdLfjZV3NrGvfwBDOuxEMlBF9295OE2xuhp StDkdDrvrWv1y0sNrjnNHWzeHkjnir0lZe3JKGl3UgQFfESmJyHsC8/cB AGh/KCJwcCzkvn13a9szBOfV55kgd2oTJ71vuHV6syl1YzGe5p+bQJqkK GCOHLhwc1e4p7FsDP57uiRrdwQWiq0/WKbFXRnEGlohDGe8GIPk+u1+ws GsGpWG8q83+omBsQRzAjJpMTF3GtI5sQYVgly4naoYeQFBSjaWar6C/w/ w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10943"; a="382466866" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,333,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="382466866" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Jan 2024 03:41:58 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10943"; a="756922330" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,333,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="756922330" Received: from amaslenx-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.36.106]) by orsmga006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Jan 2024 03:41:56 -0800 From: Jani Nikula To: Thomas Zimmermann , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [RESEND] drm/edid: prefer forward declarations over includes in drm_edid.h In-Reply-To: <2d74c31f-7a54-449d-9ddd-9a902be86ee1@suse.de> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20240104211028.1129606-1-jani.nikula@intel.com> <2d74c31f-7a54-449d-9ddd-9a902be86ee1@suse.de> Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 13:41:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87zfxkxb0e.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Fri, 05 Jan 2024, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Am 04.01.24 um 22:10 schrieb Jani Nikula: >> There's no need to include either linux/hdmi.h or drm/drm_mode.h. They >> can be removed by using forward declarations. >> >> While at it, group the forward declarations together, and remove the >> unnecessary ones. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann Thanks, pushed to drm-misc-next. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel