From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8698ECAAA3 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:10:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234607AbiHZRKe (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2022 13:10:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59124 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1344452AbiHZRKb (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2022 13:10:31 -0400 Received: from mx.cjr.nz (mx.cjr.nz [51.158.111.142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C82386FF3 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 10:10:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from authenticated-user (mx.cjr.nz [51.158.111.142]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pc) by mx.cjr.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 701248026A; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:10:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cjr.nz; s=dkim; t=1661533828; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1EvCv8yYylZ1MEgnr9abVG9LpgvMTyVXSykOjjjqk1s=; b=PFfSC5PmQb8o/OT53+xNXAmsWH6ta+xL4SXc4NSh4RJq26W32AJUMyYeHqwl4WgbPBUBZY s8VDgF6/lqPn78BZ2sB01DaLEPp/HBAn0Ak6Y61j0Wy/SMnoiXpOv5m9VovaxUQkdB/oAz gwe91X/3lsY2IjyF7vMLloHze3ujsVpmA6Z8DZVY88Q0yXObHgxIwyzrqFgDtE2MON9Usb bBpDcpkBKzymt10oWHTAYI1oZtNS0iq4mWIbb7PNFTAW9JLf7NXeKMI8LVE21Qek1OAfhm SHxQ5c5MYGC+EUib9NR1c2BulIbG8vhQGkyrcmZtXBt0tMXokKgiSiYFGoFqIA== From: Paulo Alcantara To: Tom Talpey , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SMB client testing wiki In-Reply-To: <165e9b10-2f3e-dc88-029a-c8157a98f095@talpey.com> References: <8bcbba74-d6ce-3c40-4655-e67bf75f3b3f@talpey.com> <878rnb3vkw.fsf@cjr.nz> <93e55661-ea4e-7205-d310-59105bc767ed@talpey.com> <8735dj3sem.fsf@cjr.nz> <165e9b10-2f3e-dc88-029a-c8157a98f095@talpey.com> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 14:10:46 -0300 Message-ID: <87zgfr2and.fsf@cjr.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Tom Talpey writes: > > On 8/26/2022 12:01 PM, Paulo Alcantara wrote: >> Tom Talpey writes: >> >>> Easy enough! How do I know if it "passes" though? My understanding >>> is that a bunch of tests are expected to fail, or at least warn. >>> Do I need to test a clean client, then compare results? Or am I >>> misunderstanding, and FSTYP=cifs is taking care of it? >> >> That's a really good question. We have a pre-defined list of tests that >> get run by a specfic SMB version, server, if multichannel, etc. > > Yeah, there are a few exclusion files on the wiki, but they look > really old. Also, I cannot believe that "vers=3.0" is the proper > default, as linked there!!! Yeah :-( We should definitely update it. >> Steve might send you the list of pre-defined tests that get run on our >> buildbot so you can try it out. He usually keeps those lists >> up-to-date. > > The buildbot doesn't do RDMA, or I'd consider that. But it's a lot > more convenient to have a local harness either way. It currently doesn't, unfortunately. You could at least get the same set of tests that run over 3.1.1 against samba and/or ksmbd and then change mount options to get RDMA enabled. And of course, let us know when you get it working and let's add it to our buildbot as well ;-)