Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH] virtio-vsock: add VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_NO_IMPLIED_STREAM feature bit

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Jul 08 2022, Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> wrote:

> Initially virtio-vsock only supported the stream type, which is why
> there was no feature. Later we added the seqpacket type and in the future
> we may have other types (e.g. datagram).
>
> seqpacket is an extension of stream, so it might be implied that if
> seqpacket is supported, stream is too, but this might not be true for
> other types.
>
> As we discussed here [1] should be better to add a new
> VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_NO_IMPLIED_STREAM feature bit to avoid this implication.
>
> Let's also add normative sections to better define the behavior when
> VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_NO_IMPLIED_STREAM is negotiated or not.
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/2s3qd74drgjxkvte
>
> Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> The two normative sections seem repetitive, I don't know whether it's
> better to have the "If ..." parts only in one section.
>
> Suggestions?
> ---
>  virtio-vsock.tex | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virtio-vsock.tex b/virtio-vsock.tex
> index d79984d..45f041a 100644
> --- a/virtio-vsock.tex
> +++ b/virtio-vsock.tex
> @@ -16,15 +16,37 @@ \subsection{Virtqueues}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / Virtqueues}
>  
>  \subsection{Feature bits}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / Feature bits}
>  
> -If no feature bit is set, only stream socket type is supported.
> -If VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET has been negotiated, the device MAY act
> -as if VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_STREAM has also been negotiated.
> -
>  \begin{description}
>  \item[VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_STREAM (0)] stream socket type is supported.
>  \item[VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET (1)] seqpacket socket type is supported.
> +\item[VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_NO_IMPLIED_STREAM (2)] stream socket type is not implied.
>  \end{description}
>  
> +\drivernormative{\subsubsection}{Feature bits}{Device Types / Socket Device / Feature bits}
> +
> +The driver SHOULD accept the VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_NO_IMPLIED_STREAM feature if
> +offered by the device.
> +
> +If the device does not offer the VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_NO_IMPLIED_STREAM feature
> +bit, and if no feature bit has been negotiated, the driver SHOULD act as if
> +VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_STREAM has been negotiated.
> +
> +If the device does not offer the VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_NO_IMPLIED_STREAM feature
> +bit, and if VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET has been negotiated, the driver MAY act
> +as if VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_STREAM has also been negotiated.

These statements talk about what happens if the device did not offer
NO_IMPLIED_STREAM in the first place; we instruct that the driver SHOULD
accept the flag, but do we still need to define what is supposed to
happen if the driver does not, after all, accept NO_IMPLIED_STREAM?

That would make the statements "If no feature bit has been negotiated,
..." and "If VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET has been negotiated, but not
VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_NO_IMPLIED_STREAM, ...", which is also a bit shorter (and
less repetivive :)

> +
> +\devicenormative{\subsubsection}{Feature bits}{Device Types / Socket Device / Feature bits}
> +
> +The device SHOULD offer the VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_NO_IMPLIED_STREAM feature.
> +
> +If the driver does not accept the VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_NO_IMPLIED_STREAM feature
> +bit, and if no feature bit has been negotiated, the device SHOULD act as if
> +VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_STREAM has been negotiated.

Maybe make this "If no feature bit has been negotiated, ..." (similar
reasoning as above)?

> +
> +If the driver does not accept the VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_NO_IMPLIED_STREAM feature
> +bit, and if VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET has been negotiated, the device MAY act
> +as if VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_STREAM has also been negotiated.

And maybe "If VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_SEQPACKET has been negotiated, but not
VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_NO_IMPLIED_STREAM, ..." here as well.

> +
>  \subsection{Device configuration layout}\label{sec:Device Types / Socket Device / Device configuration layout}
>  
>  Socket device configuration uses the following layout structure:

In any case, the new conformance sections need to be hooked up in
conformance.tex.


This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/