From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Forbid KVM_SET_CPUID{,2} after KVM_RUN
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 14:02:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zgnuldlk.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <517e8b95-e336-8796-6657-c0f8d554143a@redhat.com>
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> On 1/17/22 10:55, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> No, honestly I was thinking about something much simpler: instead of
>> forbidding KVM_SET_CPUID{,2} after KVM_RUN completely (what we have now
>> in 5.16), we only forbid to change certain data which we know breaks
>> some assumptions in MMU, from the comment:
>> "
>> * KVM does not correctly handle changing guest CPUID after KVM_RUN, as
>> * MAXPHYADDR, GBPAGES support, AMD reserved bit behavior, etc.. aren't
>> * tracked in kvm_mmu_page_role. As a result, KVM may miss guest page
>> * faults due to reusing SPs/SPTEs.
>> "
>> It seems that CPU hotplug path doesn't need to change these so we don't
>> need an opt-in/opt-out, we can just forbid changing certain things for
>> the time being. Alternatively, we can silently ignore such changes but I
>> don't quite like it because it would mask bugs in VMMs.
>
> I think the version that only allows exactly the same CPUID is the best,
> as it leaves less room for future bugs.
>
Ok, I hear your vote) Will prepare v2.
--
Vitaly
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-17 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-22 17:58 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Forbid KVM_SET_CPUID{,2} after KVM_RUN Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-22 17:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: Avoid KVM_SET_CPUID2 after KVM_RUN in hyperv_features test Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-22 17:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Forbid KVM_SET_CPUID{,2} after KVM_RUN Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-26 12:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-27 17:32 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-01-02 17:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-03 8:04 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-03 9:40 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-01-03 12:56 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-05 8:17 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-01-05 9:12 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-05 9:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-05 10:09 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-07 9:02 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-07 18:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-11 8:00 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-01-12 13:58 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-12 18:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-13 9:27 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-13 14:28 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-13 14:36 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-13 14:41 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-13 14:59 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-13 16:26 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-13 16:30 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-13 22:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-14 8:28 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-14 16:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-14 8:55 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-01-14 9:31 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-14 11:22 ` Igor Mammedov
2022-01-14 12:25 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-14 17:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-17 9:55 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-17 11:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-17 13:02 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zgnuldlk.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.