From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, libvir-list@redhat.com
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs/about: Unify the subject format
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 12:18:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zgtcqv1d.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210820015628.173532-3-wangyanan55@huawei.com>
On Fri, Aug 20 2021, Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com> wrote:
> Unify the subject format in deprecated.rst to "since X.Y".
> Unify the subject format in removed-features.rst to "removed in X.Y".
It seems unlikely that we will ever deprecate something in a stable
release, and even more unlikely that we'll remove something in one, so
the short versions look like the thing we want to standardize on.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
> ---
> docs/about/deprecated.rst | 56 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
> docs/about/removed-features.rst | 28 ++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
Unrelated to your patch, line 143 in removed-features.rst reads
``-vnc ...,tls=...``, ``-vnc ...,x509=...`` & ``-vnc ...,x509verify=...``
and is missing the release it was removed in (presumably 3.1?)
Anyway,
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-20 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-20 1:56 [PATCH 0/2] docs/about: some documentation clean-up Yanan Wang
2021-08-20 1:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] docs/about: Remove the duplicated doc Yanan Wang
2021-08-20 1:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] docs/about: Unify the subject format Yanan Wang
2021-08-20 10:18 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-08-23 1:34 ` wangyanan (Y)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zgtcqv1d.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.