All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
	Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: Fix softirq/hardirq disabling in iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd()
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 19:06:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zgz7t246.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f103b4a29b7c1942f091bd7b90d7a927d72c20a2.camel@coelho.fi> (Luca Coelho's message of "Sat, 13 Mar 2021 18:32:26 +0200")

Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi> writes:

> On Sat, 2021-03-13 at 16:43 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Mar 2021, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> 
>> > > > > From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > It's possible for iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd() to be called with hard IRQs 
>> > > > > disabled (e.g. from LED core). We can't enable BHs in such a situation.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > Turn the unconditional BH-enable/BH-disable code into 
>> > > > > hardirq-disable/conditional-enable.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > This fixes the warning below.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > > 
>> > > > friendly ping on this one ... 
>> > > 
>> > > Luca,
>> > > 
>> > > Johannes is telling me that he merged this patch internally, but I have no 
>> > > idea what is happening to it ... ?
>> > > 
>> > > The reported splat is a clear bug, so it should be fixed one way or the 
>> > > other.
>> > 
>> > Should I take this to wireless-drivers?
>> 
>> I can't speak for the maintainers, but as far as I am concerned, it 
>> definitely is a 5.12 material, as it fixes real scheduling bug.
>
> Yes, please take this to w-d.  We have a similar patch internally, but
> there's a backlog and it will take me some time to get to it.  I'll
> resolve eventual conflicts when time comes.

Ok, can I have your ack for patchwork?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-13 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-02 10:26 [PATCH] iwlwifi: Fix softirq/hardirq disabling in iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd() Jiri Kosina
2021-03-08  8:25 ` Jiri Kosina
2021-03-13  1:44   ` Jiri Kosina
2021-03-13  5:31     ` Kalle Valo
2021-03-13  5:49       ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-13 15:43       ` Jiri Kosina
2021-03-13 16:32         ` Luca Coelho
2021-03-13 17:06           ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2021-03-13 17:35             ` Luca Coelho
2021-03-22 12:12               ` Jiri Kosina
2021-03-23  9:13                 ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-23  9:25                   ` Jiri Kosina
2021-03-23  9:35 ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zgz7t246.fsf@codeaurora.org \
    --to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca@coelho.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.