All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
	Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
	Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
	Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Vadym Kochan <vkochan@marvell.com>,
	Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@marvell.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
	Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
	Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 6/9] net: dsa: remove the transactional logic from VLAN objects
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:49:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zh2b1otg.fsf@kurt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201217015822.826304-7-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 502 bytes --]

Hi Vladimir,

On Thu Dec 17 2020, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> It should be the driver's business to logically separate its VLAN
> offloading into a preparation and a commit phase, and some drivers don't
> need / can't do this.
>
> So remove the transactional shim from DSA and let drivers to propagate
> errors directly from the .port_vlan_add callback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

Reviewed-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>

for the hellcreek part.

Thanks,
Kurt

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-18  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-17  1:58 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/9] Get rid of the switchdev transactional model Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-17  1:58 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/9] net: switchdev: remove the transaction structure from port object notifiers Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-17  2:14   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-12-17  1:58 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/9] net: switchdev: delete switchdev_port_obj_add_now Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-17  2:14   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-12-17  1:58 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/9] net: switchdev: remove the transaction structure from port attributes Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-18  8:46   ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2020-12-27 13:26   ` Linus Walleij
2020-12-17  1:58 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/9] net: dsa: remove the transactional logic from ageing time notifiers Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-17  2:06   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-12-17  1:58 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/9] net: dsa: remove the transactional logic from MDB entries Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-17  2:08   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-12-17 11:03   ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-17  1:58 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 6/9] net: dsa: remove the transactional logic from VLAN objects Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-17  2:11   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-12-17 11:04   ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-17 11:43     ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-18  8:49   ` Kurt Kanzenbach [this message]
2020-12-27 13:30   ` Linus Walleij
2020-12-17  1:58 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 7/9] net: dsa: remove obsolete comment about switchdev transactions Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-17  2:11   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-12-17  1:58 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 8/9] mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: remove transactional logic for VLAN objects Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-17  1:58 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 9/9] net: switchdev: delete the transaction object Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-17  2:11   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-12-27 13:32 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 0/9] Get rid of the switchdev transactional model Linus Walleij
2020-12-28  9:59 ` Jiri Pirko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zh2b1otg.fsf@kurt \
    --to=kurt@linutronix.de \
    --cc=Landen.Chao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ioana.ciornei@nxp.com \
    --cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=tchornyi@marvell.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    --cc=vkochan@marvell.com \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.