From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E46C43219 for ; Fri, 3 May 2019 14:09:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA692087F for ; Fri, 3 May 2019 14:09:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netronome-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@netronome-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="TtBiPkj9" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727397AbfECOJe (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 May 2019 10:09:34 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com ([209.85.128.68]:52509 "EHLO mail-wm1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726989AbfECOJe (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 May 2019 10:09:34 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id y26so2151468wma.2 for ; Fri, 03 May 2019 07:09:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netronome-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=3LxTUsWtAnugj+yiOaxg4TXl8GgTh7eQs5xZZAZRyaA=; b=TtBiPkj9qUv5qRt5mG5HzJVFiXjO/TI+M7cB7E0/Wx+Ib2lg3ITuVgeIhlEBGsdoq+ qT9C5IYswN7vzTMTWSGEFxPYDQSC29b9g6rBEaefbp343HEAwxmCtvfs1vtTbX+bfPAM ZpCSwnHTGwFiXchnVbG10bOlTM4CHJ2Vk/c+31H8Czn0CnwuGFsFFkYOz6gGm6tZ7cKX u30YcXZUkpwxLYlyPisV8z5125ZZpO1gujKeuE/qDEtA0cVnjKWtjtT33C1Xae7ml5R5 HNVbCza19In/nlvuR66Mj754/rymiBCg6pQsz3kbDa5XEvud53ZooVkazPIHOefRrRkD aPRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=3LxTUsWtAnugj+yiOaxg4TXl8GgTh7eQs5xZZAZRyaA=; b=sR0+73gsY2nRHiSDTC4pOZbRCAUkehl54wM85PD3ItGPa66gfsrTo3h/bWu89ySYnC IEtTqMocKJSnFmEKHOza9Qox9IKI8m9kxmnf81XHx+W8nBhiYu5A09Ob+2qdgIaqe0XL 06RVK1w9YvSU1l3ECYdHdQ28wOmPOqTEzwq5yAoZ21Qd5+/swPsc9pxnVNXeKfOn+0rD hyamfikrMHvPpAt8W8nBzqyCnrNaMlfbqGuYrndQUoKROpjqaYYdSNSc2RFguw1TrVxm iEC5oh/5mYST/dCGPQoOS7uoruiTfI3DV+Grs6nj7247MX/+FKI7xwCk4FCQg9g562DH 7LDA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWpt3dRfQVDVdqpX5L2i2+AUxwjUe3aWJ/24sBBHinlZZt5Rvz8 ZboKz5FeeCLd5ydLCK45QYUGDQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy9E6ZOEkePRxtojtiwEO+EjbEE02ROsyb8URo0GPFIwy6HHw/JCsCpPIGvuFGrE6NMB8zzuw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:e916:: with SMTP id q22mr6417579wmc.148.1556892572728; Fri, 03 May 2019 07:09:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from LAPTOP-V3S7NLPL ([217.38.71.146]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a20sm4599865wrf.37.2019.05.03.07.09.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 03 May 2019 07:09:31 -0700 (PDT) References: <1556880164-10689-1-git-send-email-jiong.wang@netronome.com> <1556880164-10689-14-git-send-email-jiong.wang@netronome.com> <20190503134118.GA5602@osiris> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.2.2 From: Jiong Wang To: Heiko Carstens Cc: Jiong Wang , alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, oss-drivers@netronome.com, Martin Schwidefsky Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 13/17] s390: bpf: eliminate zero extension code-gen In-reply-to: <20190503134118.GA5602@osiris> Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 15:09:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87zho38w9y.fsf@netronome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org Heiko Carstens writes: > On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 11:42:40AM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote: >> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky >> Cc: Heiko Carstens >> Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang >> --- >> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > When sending patches which affect s390, could you please add Martin > and me on cc to _all_ patches? We now received only the cover-letter > plus one patch. It's always hard in such cirumstances to figure out if > the code is doing the right thing. OK, will do it next time. Will just CC back-end maintainers on all patches including patches for the other back-ends to make the information complete. Regards, Jiong > Usually I end up looking up the missing patches within other mailing > lists, however I haven't subscribed the bpf and netdev mailing lists. > > The extra e-mail volume because of being added to CC really doesn't > matter at all.