From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33610) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eD5Qq-00081J-8E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 04:17:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eD5Qp-0008Bc-D3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 04:17:00 -0500 From: Markus Armbruster References: <20171004152553.30263-1-mreitz@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 10:16:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20171004152553.30263-1-mreitz@redhat.com> (Max Reitz's message of "Wed, 4 Oct 2017 17:25:47 +0200") Message-ID: <87zi7u4hob.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 0/6] block: Don't compare strings in bdrv_reopen_prepare() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Max Reitz writes: > bdrv_reopen_prepare() assumes that all BDS options are strings, which is > not necessarily correct. This series introduces a new qobject_is_equal() > function which can be used to test whether any options have changed, > independently of their type. Series looks ready to me. It touches QAPI to achieve its purpose in the block layer; I'd be fine with merging it via a block tree.