From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Zhilong Liu <zlliu@suse.com>, Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mdadm: one question about the readonly and readwrite feature
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 08:55:46 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zigdt1r1.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <774691e9-6b1e-5141-bc37-6e768c1c8fdc@suse.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4103 bytes --]
On Wed, Mar 22 2017, Zhilong Liu wrote:
> Hi, Neil;
>
> Excuse me, according to read 'mdadm/tests/ToTest', I'm a little
> confused about "readonly"
> and "readwrite" feature, and I've no idea how to fix it. Thus I report
> this question and I'm sorry
> for this long description email.
>
> relevant linux/driver/md commit: 260fa034ef7a4ff8b73068b48ac497edd5217491
>
> My question: If the array has been set the MD_CLOSING flag, although
> hasn't removed the sysfs
> folder because sysfs_remove_group() wasn't invoked, and now, how should
> mdadm continue to
> control this 'readonly' array?
MD_CLOSING should only be set for a short period or time to avoid
certain races. After the operation that set it completes, it should be
cleared.
It looks like this is a bug that was introduced in
Commit: af8d8e6f0315 ("md: changes for MD_STILL_CLOSED flag")
when MD_STILL_CLOSED was renamed to MD_CLOSING.
If we already had the tests for readonly/readwrite that you are working
on, we might have caught the bug earlier - so I'm glad you are working
on these tests..
Thanks,
NeilBrown
> Of course, once we cannot operate the array, the 'readwrite' feature
> would be never worked.
>
> Test step:
> # ./mdadm -CR /dev/md0 -b internal -l1 -n2 /dev/loop[0-1] --assume-clean
> # ./mdadm -o /dev/mdX
>
> # in md.h
> enum mddev_flags {
> MD_ARRAY_FIRST_USE, /* First use of array, needs
> initialization */
> MD_CLOSING, /* If set, we are closing the array, do
> not open it then */
>
> 1. In mdadm tool:
> the func: Manage_ro(dv->devname, mdfd, -1) would be never invoked
> once the array has been
> set 'readonly' before. the open_mddev() cannot get a valid file
> descriptor any more. Most of mdadm
> commands would be failure, I have to execute the "echo clear >
> /sys/block/mdX/md/array_state".
>
> # refer to mdadm.c
> ... ...
> static int misc_list(struct mddev_dev *devlist,
> struct mddev_ident *ident,
> char *dump_directory,
> struct supertype *ss, struct context *c)
> {
> ... ...
> switch(dv->devname[0] == '/') {
> case 0:
> mdfd = open_dev(dv->devname);
> if (mdfd >= 0) break;
> case 1:
> mdfd = open_mddev(dv->devname, 1);
> }
> if (mdfd>=0) {
> switch(dv->disposition) {
> case 'R':
> c->runstop = 1;
> rv |= Manage_run(dv->devname, mdfd, c);
> break;
> case 'S':
> rv |= Manage_stop(dv->devname, mdfd,
> c->verbose, 0); break;
> case 'o':
> rv |= Manage_ro(dv->devname, mdfd, 1);
> break;
> case 'w':
> rv |= Manage_ro(dv->devname, mdfd, -1);
> break;
> }
> 2. in md driver:
> For readonly, the code path is:
> ioctl(fd, STOP_ARRAY_RO, NULL) - - > set_bit(MD_CLOSING, &mddev->flags)
> - - > md_set_readonly()
>
> cut a piece of code: - -> md_set_readonly() of md.c:
> ... ...
> if (mddev->pers) {
> __md_stop_writes(mddev);
>
> err = -ENXIO;
> if (mddev->ro==1)
> goto out;
> mddev->ro = 1;
> set_disk_ro(mddev->gendisk, 1);
> clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery);
> set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery); - - >
> I think it did nothing once readonly has been set.
> md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
> sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(mddev->sysfs_state);
> err = 0;
> ... ...
>
> Thanks for your patience,
> -Zhilong
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-22 12:00 mdadm: one question about the readonly and readwrite feature Zhilong Liu
2017-03-22 21:55 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2017-03-23 1:54 ` Guoqing Jiang
2017-03-23 2:26 ` Guoqing Jiang
2017-03-23 3:42 ` NeilBrown
2017-03-23 3:54 ` Zhilong Liu
2017-03-23 6:50 ` Zhilong Liu
2017-03-23 7:06 ` NeilBrown
2017-03-23 8:14 ` Zhilong Liu
2017-03-24 0:28 ` NeilBrown
2017-03-24 15:44 ` Zhilong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zigdt1r1.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
--to=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=jes.sorensen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlliu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.