From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blame.c: prepare_lines should not call xrealloc for every line
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 22:48:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zjm6v99y.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqr47i7dt4.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:44:55 -0800")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Ok, I now wrote
>>
>> for (p = buf;; num++, p++) {
>> p = memchr(p, '\n', end - p);
>> if (!p)
>> break;
>> }
>
> Looks still wrong (perhaps this is a taste issue).
>
> num++ is not "loop control", but the real action of this
> loop to count lines. It is better left inside.
Ok.
> p++ is "loop control", and belongs to the third part of
> for(;;).
No, it isn't. The "real" loop control is the p = memchr line. p++ only
skips over the newline.
> Isn't the normal continuation condition "p < end"?
memchr returns NULL when not finding anything any more.
> so something like
>
> for (p = buf; p < end; p++) {
> p = find the end of this line
> if (!p)
> break;
> num++;
> }
>
> perhaps?
Would crash on incomplete last line.
--
David Kastrup
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-04 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-04 20:06 [PATCH] blame.c: prepare_lines should not call xrealloc for every line David Kastrup
2014-02-04 20:10 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-04 20:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-04 21:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-04 21:09 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-04 22:28 ` Philip Oakley
2014-02-04 22:48 ` Philip Oakley
2014-02-04 20:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-04 20:52 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-04 21:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-04 21:11 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-04 21:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-04 21:27 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-04 21:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-04 21:48 ` David Kastrup [this message]
2014-02-04 22:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-05 8:39 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-05 20:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-06 0:34 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-06 10:29 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-05 9:22 ` David Kastrup
2014-02-05 20:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-05 23:45 ` David Kastrup
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-04 21:40 David Kastrup
2014-02-04 21:46 David Kastrup
2014-02-12 14:27 David Kastrup
2014-02-12 19:36 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zjm6v99y.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.