From: arno@natisbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 20:26:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zjoyoox3.fsf@natisbad.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131120191145.GP8581@1wt.eu> (Willy Tarreau's message of "Wed, 20 Nov 2013 20:11:45 +0100")
Hi,
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> writes:
> first, thanks for all these tests.
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:53:43AM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote:
> (...)
>> In the end, here are the conclusions *I* draw from this test session,
>> do not hesitate to correct me:
>>
>> - Eric, it seems something changed in linus tree betwen the beginning
>> of the thread and now, which somehow reduces the effect of the
>> regression we were seen: I never got back the 256KB/s.
>> - You revert patch still improves the perf a lot
>> - It seems reducing MVNETA_TX_DONE_TIMER_PERIOD does not help
>> - w/ your revert patch, I can confirm that mvneta driver is capable of
>> doing line rate w/ proper tweak of TCP send window (256KB instead of
>> 4M)
>> - It seems I will I have to spend some time on the SATA issues I
>> previously thought were an artefact of not cleaning my tree during a
>> debug session [1], i.e. there is IMHO an issue.
>
> Could you please try Eric's patch that was just merged into Linus' tree
> if it was not yet in the kernel you tried :
>
> 98e09386c0e tcp: tsq: restore minimal amount of queueing
I have it in my quilt set.
> For me it restored the original performance (I saturate the Gbps with
> about 7 concurrent streams).
>
> Further, I wrote the small patch below for mvneta. I'm not sure it's
> smp-safe but it's a PoC. In mvneta_poll() which currently is only called
> upon Rx interrupt, it tries to flush all possible remaining Tx descriptors
> if any. That significantly improved my transfer rate, now I easily achieve
> 1 Gbps using a single TCP stream on the mirabox. Not tried on the AX3 yet.
>
> It also increased the overall connection rate by 10% on empty HTTP responses
> (small packets), very likely by reducing the dead time between some segments!
>
> You'll probably want to give it a try, so here it comes.
hehe, I was falling short of patches to test tonight ;-) I will give it
a try now.
Cheers,
a+
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arno@natisbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard)
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
simon.guinot@sequanux.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
edumazet@google.com, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 20:26:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zjoyoox3.fsf@natisbad.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131120191145.GP8581@1wt.eu> (Willy Tarreau's message of "Wed, 20 Nov 2013 20:11:45 +0100")
Hi,
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> writes:
> first, thanks for all these tests.
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:53:43AM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote:
> (...)
>> In the end, here are the conclusions *I* draw from this test session,
>> do not hesitate to correct me:
>>
>> - Eric, it seems something changed in linus tree betwen the beginning
>> of the thread and now, which somehow reduces the effect of the
>> regression we were seen: I never got back the 256KB/s.
>> - You revert patch still improves the perf a lot
>> - It seems reducing MVNETA_TX_DONE_TIMER_PERIOD does not help
>> - w/ your revert patch, I can confirm that mvneta driver is capable of
>> doing line rate w/ proper tweak of TCP send window (256KB instead of
>> 4M)
>> - It seems I will I have to spend some time on the SATA issues I
>> previously thought were an artefact of not cleaning my tree during a
>> debug session [1], i.e. there is IMHO an issue.
>
> Could you please try Eric's patch that was just merged into Linus' tree
> if it was not yet in the kernel you tried :
>
> 98e09386c0e tcp: tsq: restore minimal amount of queueing
I have it in my quilt set.
> For me it restored the original performance (I saturate the Gbps with
> about 7 concurrent streams).
>
> Further, I wrote the small patch below for mvneta. I'm not sure it's
> smp-safe but it's a PoC. In mvneta_poll() which currently is only called
> upon Rx interrupt, it tries to flush all possible remaining Tx descriptors
> if any. That significantly improved my transfer rate, now I easily achieve
> 1 Gbps using a single TCP stream on the mirabox. Not tried on the AX3 yet.
>
> It also increased the overall connection rate by 10% on empty HTTP responses
> (small packets), very likely by reducing the dead time between some segments!
>
> You'll probably want to give it a try, so here it comes.
hehe, I was falling short of patches to test tonight ;-) I will give it
a try now.
Cheers,
a+
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-20 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 121+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-10 13:53 [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-10 13:53 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-12 6:48 ` Cong Wang
2013-11-12 6:48 ` Cong Wang
2013-11-12 7:56 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-12 7:56 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-12 8:36 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-12 8:36 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-12 9:14 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-12 9:14 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-12 10:01 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-12 10:01 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-12 15:34 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-12 15:34 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-13 7:22 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-13 7:22 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-17 14:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-17 14:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-17 17:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-17 17:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-19 6:44 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-19 6:44 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-19 13:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-19 13:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-19 17:43 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-19 17:43 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-19 18:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-19 18:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-19 18:41 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-19 18:41 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-19 23:53 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-19 23:53 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 0:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 0:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 0:35 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 0:35 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 0:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 0:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 0:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 0:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 8:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-20 8:50 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-20 19:21 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 19:11 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 19:11 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 19:26 ` Arnaud Ebalard [this message]
2013-11-20 19:26 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 21:28 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 21:28 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 21:54 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 21:54 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 0:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 0:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 18:38 ` ARM network performance and dma_mask (was: [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s) Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 19:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-21 19:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-21 21:51 ` ARM network performance and dma_mask (was: [BUG, REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+, 3.12: " Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 21:51 ` ARM network performance and dma_mask (was: [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: " Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 22:01 ` ARM network performance and dma_mask Rob Herring
2013-11-21 22:01 ` Rob Herring
2013-11-21 22:13 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 22:13 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 21:51 ` [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-21 21:51 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-21 21:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 21:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 22:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-21 22:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-21 22:55 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-21 22:55 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-21 23:23 ` Rick Jones
2013-11-21 23:23 ` Rick Jones
2013-11-20 17:12 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 17:12 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 17:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 17:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 17:38 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 17:38 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 18:52 ` David Miller
2013-11-20 18:52 ` David Miller
2013-11-20 17:34 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 17:34 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 17:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 17:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 18:15 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 18:15 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 18:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 18:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 18:29 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 18:29 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 19:22 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 19:22 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-18 10:09 ` David Laight
2013-11-18 10:09 ` David Laight
2013-11-18 10:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-18 10:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-18 10:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-18 10:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-18 10:44 ` Simon Guinot
2013-11-18 10:44 ` Simon Guinot
2013-11-18 16:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-11-18 16:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-11-18 17:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-18 17:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-18 10:51 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-18 10:51 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-18 17:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-11-18 17:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-11-12 14:39 ` [PATCH] tcp: tsq: restore minimal amount of queueing Eric Dumazet
2013-11-12 15:24 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-11-13 14:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-13 14:32 ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2013-11-13 21:18 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-13 21:59 ` Holger Hoffstaette
2013-11-13 23:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-13 23:52 ` Holger Hoffstaette
2013-11-17 23:15 ` Francois Romieu
2013-11-18 16:26 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2013-11-18 16:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-13 22:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-14 21:26 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zjoyoox3.fsf@natisbad.org \
--to=arno@natisbad.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.