From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>,
Don Slutz <Don@cloudswitch.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw: Add support for new LSI Logic devices.
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 08:14:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zk4ujc8f.fsf@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50517C05.3080708@redhat.com>
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> Il 12/09/2012 15:58, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>> Why would someone use this verses megasas vs. LSI vs virtio-scsi?
>
> LSI is dead. Compare it to IDE.
>
> virtio-scsi has the highest performance, but it is not supported on all
> guests. Compare it to virtio-blk.
>
> This vs. megasas is a good question; both can be compared to AHCI, they
> have good performance and have the advantage of compatibility with real
> hardware. If this had gone in first, I would probably have rejected
> megasas, but this has the advantage of being used in VMware and
> VirtualBox. Plus, unlike megasas Don said he'd work on SeaBIOS support,
> so it has further merit.
Okay. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
> Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-13 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-11 17:00 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw: Add support for new LSI Logic devices Don Slutz
2012-09-11 23:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-12 6:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-12 12:36 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-09-12 13:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-09-13 6:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-13 13:14 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2012-10-04 13:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2012-09-13 12:43 ` Don Slutz
2012-09-12 6:58 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2012-09-13 17:10 ` Don Slutz
2012-09-12 15:38 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-13 12:46 ` Don Slutz
2012-09-13 13:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-13 20:57 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-09-29 14:35 ` Don Slutz
2012-10-01 14:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-08 19:03 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zk4ujc8f.fsf@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=Don@cloudswitch.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.