From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50550) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvvOj-0005qN-Kz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:12:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvvOi-0002fX-Lw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:12:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32924) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvvOi-0002fR-DT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:12:56 -0400 From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <1343554983-4195-3-git-send-email-owasserm@redhat.com> (Orit Wasserman's message of "Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:42:54 +0300") References: <1343554983-4195-1-git-send-email-owasserm@redhat.com> <1343554983-4195-3-git-send-email-owasserm@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:12:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87zk6h3vy4.fsf@trasno.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/11] Add migrate_set_parameter and query-migrate-parameters Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Orit Wasserman Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, aliguori@us.ibm.com, stefanha@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, blauwirbel@gmail.com, chegu_vinod@hp.com, avi@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com Orit Wasserman wrote: > The management can enable/disable a capability for the next migration by using > migrate_set_parameter command. > The management can query the current migration capabilities using > query-migrate-parameters > > Signed-off-by: Orit Wasserman > Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela I just noticed .... shouldn't we use migrate_set_parameter cache_size 256M ??? I think that even the old migration parameters could be added to this one? migrate_set_parameter downtime 30ms migrate_set_parameter bandwidth 1G This way everything would be more regular, and easier on libvirt, as new parameters would be trivial to ask for? Notice that I can understand that we have to maintain the old commands for compability, but we can do "regularly" for new ones? Later, Juan.