From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/21] Revert "OMAP3+: PM: SR: add suspend/resume handlers" Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:49:42 -0800 Message-ID: <87zkdbehx5.fsf@ti.com> References: <1327504583-13408-1-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com> <1327504583-13408-6-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com> <4F2041B1.6060907@ti.com> <4F204916.7050504@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog107.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.197]:58050 "EHLO na3sys009aog107.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751182Ab2AYStp (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:49:45 -0500 Received: by mail-vw0-f54.google.com with SMTP id fa15so2899976vbb.27 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:49:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F204916.7050504@ti.com> (Benoit Cousson's message of "Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:25:26 +0100") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Cousson, Benoit" Cc: Jean Pihet , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, balbi@ti.com, nm@ti.com, Paul Walmsley , Jean Pihet "Cousson, Benoit" writes: > On 1/25/2012 7:13 PM, Jean Pihet wrote: [...] >>> >>> I guess that path #3 and #5 should just be removed. >> I am ok with both options (keeping or removing the 2 commits), please >> let me know what you prefer. > > I guess that removing both is the only acceptable solution > anyway. Yes, please remove them both. Kevin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:49:42 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 05/21] Revert "OMAP3+: PM: SR: add suspend/resume handlers" In-Reply-To: <4F204916.7050504@ti.com> (Benoit Cousson's message of "Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:25:26 +0100") References: <1327504583-13408-1-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com> <1327504583-13408-6-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com> <4F2041B1.6060907@ti.com> <4F204916.7050504@ti.com> Message-ID: <87zkdbehx5.fsf@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org "Cousson, Benoit" writes: > On 1/25/2012 7:13 PM, Jean Pihet wrote: [...] >>> >>> I guess that path #3 and #5 should just be removed. >> I am ok with both options (keeping or removing the 2 commits), please >> let me know what you prefer. > > I guess that removing both is the only acceptable solution > anyway. Yes, please remove them both. Kevin