From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: JJ Ding Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] Input: elantech - work around EC buffer Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:54:36 +0800 Message-ID: <87zkj72or7.fsf@emc.com.tw> References: <1313632629-23603-1-git-send-email-jj_ding@emc.com.tw> <1313632629-23603-5-git-send-email-jj_ding@emc.com.tw> <20110818063918.GD10093@core.coreip.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from emcscan.emc.com.tw ([192.72.220.5]:41535 "EHLO emcscan.emc.com.tw" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755108Ab1HRGwS (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 02:52:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110818063918.GD10093@core.coreip.homeip.net> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Seth Forshee , Aaron Huang , Tom Lin , Eric Piel , Daniel Kurtz , Chase Douglas , Henrik Rydberg , Alessandro Rubini Hi Dmitry, On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:39:18 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:57:07AM +0800, JJ Ding wrote: > > With some EC chips, when we resync due to bad packets, those bad bytes would > > still remain in EC's buffer area. That makes us always get bad data back, > > no matter what. > > > > So shift packet for 1 byte when encounter bad packet, until we get rid of those > > bytes. > > If we want to do this I think it should be done in psmouse core. > > Thanks. OK. That sounds more appropriate. I will remove this patch from the series. Thanks, jj > > -- > Dmitry