From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP4: clockdomain: Follow recommended enable sequence Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:28:45 -0800 Message-ID: <87zkp4dzr6.fsf@ti.com> References: <1299245123-23444-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <4D775418.6050105@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog103.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.71]:39141 "EHLO na3sys009aog103.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755047Ab1CIQ2z (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:28:55 -0500 Received: by mail-yx0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 30so418849yxk.17 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:28:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D775418.6050105@ti.com> (Rajendra Nayak's message of "Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:49:04 +0530") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Rajendra Nayak Cc: Paul Walmsley , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, b-cousson@ti.com, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Rajendra Nayak writes: >> In terms of triage, does this patch fix something that currently doesn't >> work (meaning that we should try to merge it for 2.6.39)? Or can we plan >> to merge this during the 2.6.40 time frame? It would be ideal, of course, >> if we could wait until 2.6.40, given how close we are to the merge window >> opening. > > Since no clockdomains on OMAP4 were programmed in HW_AUTO untill now, > we did not have any issues, but with the recent series from Santosh > (which adds mpu ret/off support in idle/suspend) programming the > clockdomains to HW_AUTO did show issues/aborts, and this patch > fixes them. FWIW, I was planning to merge the OMAP4 MPU ret/off series from Santosh for 2.6.39, so this patch would be required for that to series to work. Kevin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman) Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 08:28:45 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] OMAP4: clockdomain: Follow recommended enable sequence In-Reply-To: <4D775418.6050105@ti.com> (Rajendra Nayak's message of "Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:49:04 +0530") References: <1299245123-23444-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <4D775418.6050105@ti.com> Message-ID: <87zkp4dzr6.fsf@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Rajendra Nayak writes: >> In terms of triage, does this patch fix something that currently doesn't >> work (meaning that we should try to merge it for 2.6.39)? Or can we plan >> to merge this during the 2.6.40 time frame? It would be ideal, of course, >> if we could wait until 2.6.40, given how close we are to the merge window >> opening. > > Since no clockdomains on OMAP4 were programmed in HW_AUTO untill now, > we did not have any issues, but with the recent series from Santosh > (which adds mpu ret/off support in idle/suspend) programming the > clockdomains to HW_AUTO did show issues/aborts, and this patch > fixes them. FWIW, I was planning to merge the OMAP4 MPU ret/off series from Santosh for 2.6.39, so this patch would be required for that to series to work. Kevin