From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:36:23 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] Non-x86 support question In-Reply-To: <200911261521.32631.minimod@morethan.org> (Michael S. Zick's message of "Thu\, 26 Nov 2009 15\:21\:30 -0600") References: <200911261521.32631.minimod@morethan.org> Message-ID: <87zl696ka0.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Michael" == Michael S Zick writes: Michael> Just wondering, does buildroot get tested as a cross-compiler Michael> building native toolchain? The BR2_PACKAGE_GCC_TARGET? No, that isn't commonly used. That doesn't mean that it shouldn't work ofcourse. Michael> There is a similar bug posted, which I think refers to building Michael> the foreign, native, compiler. Michael> At least that is my own problem. ;) Michael> In my case, gcc's configure is failing when it tries to test for Michael> the presence of mpfr (which is present, and built) - - - Michael> (No problem with gpm) Hmm, it worked for me last time I tried (some time this summer). Michael> I have captured the configure command being run and the test file, Michael> then ran them "by hand" with -v the best I can figure out at Michael> that point is: Could you provide a bit more details? What goes wrong? Michael> A true puzzle, not a show-stopper here, anytime by 2010.02 Michael> would be fine. This is gcc-4.3.whatever targeting mipsel. It would be good if you could add a bugreport to bugzilla so we don't forget about it. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard