From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Linux MM Mailing List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: more likely reclaim MADV_SEQUENTIAL mappings II
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:21:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zlkuj10z.fsf@saeurebad.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878wsigp2e.fsf_-_@saeurebad.de> (Johannes Weiner's message of "Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:33:45 +0200")
Finally got some half-way stable time numbers for this patch.
My approach was to generate background activity by dd'ing my hard-drive
to /dev/null and meanwhile copy a 1G file with memcpy() between two
mmaps and then the same file again with MADV_SEQUENTIAL mmaps. The
numbers below are averages/standard deviations from 8 copy iterations.
I dropped the caches before each copy and waited for them to become
repopulated by the background dd.
The numbers in brackets are the std dev.
mmotm:
normal user: 1.775000s [0.053307] system: 9.620000s [0.135339] total: 98.875000s [0.613956]
madvise user: 2.552500s [0.041307] system: 9.442500s [0.075980] total: 73.937500s [0.734170]
mmotm+patch:
normal user: 1.850000s [0.013540] system: 9.760000s [0.047081] total: 99.250000s [0.569386]
madvise user: 2.547500s [0.014930] system: 8.865000s [0.055000] total: 71.897500s [0.144763]
Well, time-wise not sooo much of an improvement. But given the
massively decreased LRU-rotation [ http://hannes.saeurebad.de/madvseq/ ]
I'm still looking forward to Kosaki-san's throughput measurements :)
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-24 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-21 10:32 [rfc] mm: more likely reclaim MADV_SEQUENTIAL mappings Johannes Weiner
2008-10-21 10:43 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-21 11:33 ` [patch] mm: more likely reclaim MADV_SEQUENTIAL mappings II Johannes Weiner
2008-10-21 22:13 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-22 0:09 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-10-22 0:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-10-22 6:39 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-10-22 7:15 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-10-22 7:41 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-24 0:21 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2008-10-24 12:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-10-24 14:02 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-10-24 14:31 ` Rik van Riel
2008-10-24 16:15 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-10-24 23:48 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-10-24 18:59 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-10-21 14:40 ` [rfc] mm: more likely reclaim MADV_SEQUENTIAL mappings Rik van Riel
2008-10-21 15:20 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zlkuj10z.fsf@saeurebad.de \
--to=hannes@saeurebad.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.