From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package: oprofile
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:08:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zlrj2khz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080424165429.5E3993C7F0@busybox.net> (ninevoltz@uclibc.org's message of "Thu\, 24 Apr 2008 09\:54\:29 -0700 \(PDT\)")
>>>>> "ninevoltz" == ninevoltz <ninevoltz@uclibc.org> writes:
ninevoltz> Author: ninevoltz
ninevoltz> Date: 2008-04-24 09:54:29 -0700 (Thu, 24 Apr 2008)
ninevoltz> New Revision: 21847
ninevoltz> Log:
ninevoltz> add oprofile
ninevoltz> Added:
ninevoltz> trunk/buildroot/package/oprofile/
ninevoltz> trunk/buildroot/package/oprofile/Config.in
ninevoltz> trunk/buildroot/package/oprofile/oprofile-0.9.3-avr32.patch
Please use the .patch.avr32 naming convention.
ninevoltz> Added: trunk/buildroot/package/oprofile/Config.in
ninevoltz> ===================================================================
ninevoltz> --- trunk/buildroot/package/oprofile/Config.in (rev 0)
ninevoltz> +++ trunk/buildroot/package/oprofile/Config.in 2008-04-24 16:54:29 UTC (rev 21847)
ninevoltz> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
ninevoltz> +config BR2_PACKAGE_OPROFILE
ninevoltz> + bool "oprofile"
ninevoltz> + default n
ninevoltz> + select BR2_PACKAGE_POPT
ninevoltz> + select BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP
Does that actually work? I mean, does the compiler get recompiled with
C++ support if you select this package after your initial make?
If not, we should make it a depends instead.
ninevoltz> + OProfile leverages the hardware performance counters of the
ninevoltz> + CPU to enable profiling of a wide variety of interesting
ninevoltz> + statistics, which can also be used for basic time-spent
ninevoltz> + profiling. All code is profiled: hardware and software
ninevoltz> + interrupt handlers, kernel modules, the kernel, shared
ninevoltz> + libraries, and applications.
Trailing space.
ninevoltz> --- trunk/buildroot/package/oprofile/oprofile-fix-autoconf-brain-damage.patch (rev 0)
ninevoltz> +++ trunk/buildroot/package/oprofile/oprofile-fix-autoconf-brain-damage.patch 2008-04-24 16:54:29 UTC (rev 21847)
ninevoltz> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
ninevoltz> +diff --git a/libutil++/bfd_support.cpp b/libutil++/bfd_support.cpp
ninevoltz> +index a33836f..9b0d1b2 100644
ninevoltz> +--- a/libutil++/bfd_support.cpp
ninevoltz> ++++ b/libutil++/bfd_support.cpp
ninevoltz> +@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ void bfd_info::close()
ninevoltz> + }
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +-#if SYNTHESIZE_SYMBOLS
ninevoltz> ++#if SYNTHESIZE_SYMBOLS && 0
What does this fix?
ninevoltz> +OPROFILE_DIR := $(BUILD_DIR)/oprofile-$(OPROFILE_VERSION)
ninevoltz> +OPROFILE_SITE := http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/oprofile
$(BR2_SOURCEFORGE_MIRROR).dl.sourceforge.net ?
ninevoltz> +OPROFILE_SOURCE := oprofile-$(OPROFILE_VERSION).tar.gz
ninevoltz> +OPROFILE_CAT := $(ZCAT)
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +OPROFILE_BINARIES := utils/ophelp
ninevoltz> +OPROFILE_BINARIES += pp/opannotate pp/oparchive pp/opgprof pp/opreport
ninevoltz> +OPROFILE_BINARIES += daemon/oprofiled
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +$(DL_DIR)/$(OPROFILE_SOURCE):
ninevoltz> + $(WGET) -P $(DL_DIR) $(OPROFILE_SITE)/$(OPROFILE_SOURCE)
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +oprofile-source: $(DL_DIR)/$(OPROFILE_SOURCE)
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +$(OPROFILE_DIR)/.unpacked: $(DL_DIR)/$(OPROFILE_SOURCE)
ninevoltz> + $(OPROFILE_CAT) $(DL_DIR)/$(OPROFILE_SOURCE) | tar -C $(BUILD_DIR) $(TAR_OPTIONS) -
ninevoltz> + toolchain/patch-kernel.sh $(OPROFILE_DIR) package/oprofile/ \*.patch*
ninevoltz> + $(CONFIG_UPDATE) $(OPROFILE_DIR)
ninevoltz> + touch $@
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +$(OPROFILE_DIR)/.configured: $(OPROFILE_DIR)/.unpacked
ninevoltz> + (cd $(OPROFILE_DIR); rm -f config.cache; \
ninevoltz> + $(TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS) \
ninevoltz> + $(TARGET_CONFIGURE_ARGS) \
ninevoltz> + ./configure \
ninevoltz> + --target=$(GNU_TARGET_NAME) \
ninevoltz> + --host=$(GNU_TARGET_NAME) \
ninevoltz> + --build=$(GNU_HOST_NAME) \
ninevoltz> + --prefix=/usr \
ninevoltz> + --sysconfdir=/etc \
ninevoltz> + --localstatedir=/var \
ninevoltz> + --includedir=/include \
ninevoltz> + );
ninevoltz> + touch $@
Why not use AUTOTOOLS?
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +$(OPROFILE_DIR)/daemon/oprofiled: $(OPROFILE_DIR)/.configured
ninevoltz> + PATH=$(TARGET_PATH) $(MAKE) -C $(OPROFILE_DIR)
ninevoltz> + touch -c $@
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +$(TARGET_DIR)/usr/bin/oprofiled: $(OPROFILE_DIR)/daemon/oprofiled
ninevoltz> + $(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/bin
ninevoltz> + $(INSTALL) -d -m 755 $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/share/oprofile/avr32
ninevoltz> + $(INSTALL) -m 644 $(addprefix $(OPROFILE_DIR)/events/avr32/, events unit_masks) $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/share/oprofile/avr32
avr32?
ninevoltz> + $(INSTALL) -m 644 $(OPROFILE_DIR)/libregex/stl.pat $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/share/oprofile
ninevoltz> + $(INSTALL) -m 755 $(OPROFILE_DIR)/utils/opcontrol $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/bin
ninevoltz> + $(INSTALL) -m 755 $(addprefix $(OPROFILE_DIR)/, $(OPROFILE_BINARIES)) $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/bin
ninevoltz> + $(STRIP) --strip-unneeded $(addprefix $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/bin/, $(notdir $(OPROFILE_BINARIES)))
ninevoltz> + touch -c $@
ninevoltz> +
ninevoltz> +oprofile: uclibc popt binutils_target $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/bin/oprofiled
Doesn't it need popt at configure time?
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-24 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-24 16:54 [Buildroot] svn commit: trunk/buildroot/package: oprofile ninevoltz at uclibc.org
2008-04-24 18:08 ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
2008-04-24 18:20 ` John Voltz
2008-04-24 18:46 ` Peter Korsgaard
2008-04-24 19:04 ` John Voltz
2008-04-25 8:17 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2008-04-25 6:48 ` Hamish Moffatt
2008-04-25 8:09 ` Bernhard Fischer
2008-04-25 8:18 ` Peter Korsgaard
2008-04-25 8:36 ` Bernhard Fischer
2008-04-25 8:21 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zlrj2khz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk \
--to=jacmet@uclibc.org \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.